All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+069cc167ecbee6e3e91a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: chandan.babu@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [xfs?] possible deadlock in xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 18:43:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00000000000015a57d0619152dcd@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    4b377b4868ef kprobe/ftrace: fix build error due to bad fun..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16f19368980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=17ffd15f654c98ba
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=069cc167ecbee6e3e91a
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/80503f9339d4/disk-4b377b48.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c74a52927209/vmlinux-4b377b48.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6ea396d85317/bzImage-4b377b48.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+069cc167ecbee6e3e91a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.9.0-syzkaller-08544-g4b377b4868ef #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.3/11981 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8e42ad40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:312 [inline]
ffffffff8e42ad40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3819 [inline]
ffffffff8e42ad40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3900 [inline]
ffffffff8e42ad40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4038 [inline]
ffffffff8e42ad40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0xb7/0x4a0 mm/slub.c:4052

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88806a1308d8 (&xfs_dir_ilock_class){++++}-{3:3}, at: xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared+0x8c/0xc0 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:126

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&xfs_dir_ilock_class){++++}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       down_write_nested+0x3d/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1695
       xfs_reclaim_inode fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:945 [inline]
       xfs_icwalk_process_inode fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:1631 [inline]
       xfs_icwalk_ag+0x120e/0x1ad0 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:1713
       xfs_icwalk fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:1762 [inline]
       xfs_reclaim_inodes_nr+0x257/0x360 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:1011
       super_cache_scan+0x411/0x4b0 fs/super.c:227
       do_shrink_slab+0x707/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
       shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
       shrink_slab+0x883/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:626
       shrink_one+0x453/0x880 mm/vmscan.c:4774
       shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4835 [inline]
       lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4935 [inline]
       shrink_node+0x3b17/0x4310 mm/vmscan.c:5894
       kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6704 [inline]
       balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6895 [inline]
       kswapd+0x1882/0x38a0 mm/vmscan.c:7164
       kthread+0x2f2/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
       ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

-> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
       __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3698 [inline]
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x140 mm/page_alloc.c:3712
       might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:312 [inline]
       slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3819 [inline]
       slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3900 [inline]
       __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4038 [inline]
       __kmalloc+0xb7/0x4a0 mm/slub.c:4052
       kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:632 [inline]
       xfs_attr_shortform_list+0x6f3/0x17a0 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c:115
       xfs_attr_list_ilocked fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c:527 [inline]
       xfs_attr_list+0x25b/0x350 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c:547
       xfs_vn_listxattr+0x1d2/0x2c0 fs/xfs/xfs_xattr.c:314
       vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline]
       listxattr+0x109/0x290 fs/xattr.c:840
       path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline]
       __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline]
       __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline]
       __x64_sys_listxattr+0x176/0x240 fs/xattr.c:873
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  rlock(&xfs_dir_ilock_class);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(&xfs_dir_ilock_class);
  lock(fs_reclaim);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.3/11981:
 #0: ffff88806a1308d8 (&xfs_dir_ilock_class){++++}-{3:3}, at: xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared+0x8c/0xc0 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:126

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 11981 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.9.0-syzkaller-08544-g4b377b4868ef #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3698 [inline]
 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x140 mm/page_alloc.c:3712
 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:312 [inline]
 slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3819 [inline]
 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3900 [inline]
 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4038 [inline]
 __kmalloc+0xb7/0x4a0 mm/slub.c:4052
 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:632 [inline]
 xfs_attr_shortform_list+0x6f3/0x17a0 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c:115
 xfs_attr_list_ilocked fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c:527 [inline]
 xfs_attr_list+0x25b/0x350 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c:547
 xfs_vn_listxattr+0x1d2/0x2c0 fs/xfs/xfs_xattr.c:314
 vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline]
 listxattr+0x109/0x290 fs/xattr.c:840
 path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline]
 __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline]
 __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline]
 __x64_sys_listxattr+0x176/0x240 fs/xattr.c:873
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fa1f3a7cee9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fa1f48160c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000c2
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa1f3bac050 RCX: 00007fa1f3a7cee9
RDX: 0000000000000011 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000020000140
RBP: 00007fa1f3ac949e R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007fa1f3bac050 R15: 00007ffdecee0588
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

             reply	other threads:[~2024-05-23  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23  1:43 syzbot [this message]
2024-08-20 15:26 ` [syzbot] [xfs?] possible deadlock in xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=00000000000015a57d0619152dcd@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+069cc167ecbee6e3e91a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.