From: syzbot <syzbot+3800901c18018cf7ff68@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
tj@kernel.org
Subject: [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in mnt_want_write (3)
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 23:31:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000229e93060ddd5ea6@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 453f5db0619e Merge tag 'trace-v6.7-rc7' of git://git.kerne..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1011351de80000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f8e72bae38c079e4
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3800901c18018cf7ff68
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/38b92a7149e8/disk-453f5db0.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4f872267133f/vmlinux-453f5db0.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/587572061791/bzImage-453f5db0.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+3800901c18018cf7ff68@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.7.0-rc7-syzkaller-00049-g453f5db0619e #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.4/5849 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88814c8dc418 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:404
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807d50efe0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline]
ffff88807d50efe0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3543 [inline]
ffff88807d50efe0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x7bc/0x3290 fs/namei.c:3776
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:812 [inline]
lookup_slow+0x45/0x70 fs/namei.c:1710
walk_component+0x2d0/0x400 fs/namei.c:2002
lookup_last fs/namei.c:2459 [inline]
path_lookupat+0x16f/0x450 fs/namei.c:2483
filename_lookup+0x255/0x610 fs/namei.c:2512
kern_path+0x35/0x50 fs/namei.c:2610
lookup_bdev+0xc5/0x290 block/bdev.c:979
resume_store+0x1a0/0x710 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1177
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3b3/0x510 fs/kernfs/file.c:334
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2020 [inline]
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]
vfs_write+0x792/0xb20 fs/read_write.c:584
ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:637
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
-> #2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd60 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
kernfs_seq_start+0x53/0x3a0 fs/kernfs/file.c:154
seq_read_iter+0x3d4/0xd10 fs/seq_file.c:225
call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2014 [inline]
new_sync_read fs/read_write.c:389 [inline]
vfs_read+0x78b/0xb00 fs/read_write.c:470
ksys_read+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:613
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
-> #1 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd60 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
seq_read_iter+0xb2/0xd10 fs/seq_file.c:182
call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2014 [inline]
copy_splice_read+0x4c9/0x9c0 fs/splice.c:364
splice_direct_to_actor+0x2c4/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:1069
do_splice_direct+0x2ac/0x3f0 fs/splice.c:1194
do_sendfile+0x62c/0x1000 fs/read_write.c:1254
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1322 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64+0x17c/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:1308
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
-> #0 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x1909/0x5ab0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1635 [inline]
sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1710
mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:404
ovl_create_object+0x13b/0x360 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:629
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3477 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3546 [inline]
path_openat+0x13fa/0x3290 fs/namei.c:3776
do_filp_open+0x234/0x490 fs/namei.c:3809
do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1437
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1452 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1468 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1463 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x290 fs/open.c:1463
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
sb_writers#4 --> &of->mutex --> &ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]);
lock(&of->mutex);
lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]);
rlock(sb_writers#4);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by syz-executor.4/5849:
#0: ffff888079772418 (sb_writers#28){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:404
#1: ffff88807d50efe0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline]
#1: ffff88807d50efe0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3543 [inline]
#1: ffff88807d50efe0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x7bc/0x3290 fs/namei.c:3776
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5849 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc7-syzkaller-00049-g453f5db0619e #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/17/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x366/0x490 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x1909/0x5ab0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1635 [inline]
sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1710
mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:404
ovl_create_object+0x13b/0x360 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:629
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3477 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3546 [inline]
path_openat+0x13fa/0x3290 fs/namei.c:3776
do_filp_open+0x234/0x490 fs/namei.c:3809
do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1437
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1452 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1468 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1463 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x290 fs/open.c:1463
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
RIP: 0033:0x7fa7b5a7cce9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fa7b686b0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa7b5b9bf80 RCX: 00007fa7b5a7cce9
RDX: 0000000000141842 RSI: 0000000020000440 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c
RBP: 00007fa7b5ac947a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fa7b5b9bf80 R15: 00007ffec2fc2058
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
reply other threads:[~2024-01-01 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=000000000000229e93060ddd5ea6@google.com \
--to=syzbot+3800901c18018cf7ff68@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.