All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+c75d1de73d3b8b76272f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: agordeev@linux.ibm.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com,
	davem@davemloft.net,  edumazet@google.com,
	guwen@linux.alibaba.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,  kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,  tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
	wenjia@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [syzbot] [net?] [s390?] possible deadlock in smc_vlan_by_tcpsk
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:15:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000002e944b061bcfd65f@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    185d72112b95 net: xilinx: axienet: Enable multicast by def..
git tree:       net-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13e0ec8e980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e78fc116033e0ab7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c75d1de73d3b8b76272f
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e84f50e44254/disk-185d7211.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/df64b575cc01/vmlinux-185d7211.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/16ad5d1d433b/bzImage-185d7211.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+c75d1de73d3b8b76272f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

syz-executor.2[7759] is installing a program with bpf_probe_write_user helper that may corrupt user memory!
syz-executor.2[7759] is installing a program with bpf_probe_write_user helper that may corrupt user memory!
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-rc4-syzkaller-00869-g185d72112b95 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/7759 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8f5e6f48 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_vlan_by_tcpsk+0x399/0x4e0 net/smc/smc_core.c:1853

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88801bed0258 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1602 [inline]
ffff88801bed0258 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_connect+0xb7/0xde0 net/smc/af_smc.c:1650

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       lock_sock_nested+0x48/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3543
       do_ipv6_setsockopt+0xbf3/0x3630 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:567
       ipv6_setsockopt+0x5c/0x1a0 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:993
       do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2312
       __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2335
       __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
       __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
       __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2341
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
       __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       smc_vlan_by_tcpsk+0x399/0x4e0 net/smc/smc_core.c:1853
       __smc_connect+0x2a4/0x1890 net/smc/af_smc.c:1522
       smc_connect+0x868/0xde0 net/smc/af_smc.c:1702
       __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2049 [inline]
       __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2066
       __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2076 [inline]
       __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2073 [inline]
       __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2073
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(sk_lock-AF_INET6);
                               lock(rtnl_mutex);
                               lock(sk_lock-AF_INET6);
  lock(rtnl_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.2/7759:
 #0: ffff88801bed0258 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1602 [inline]
 #0: ffff88801bed0258 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_connect+0xb7/0xde0 net/smc/af_smc.c:1650

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 7759 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4-syzkaller-00869-g185d72112b95 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
 smc_vlan_by_tcpsk+0x399/0x4e0 net/smc/smc_core.c:1853
 __smc_connect+0x2a4/0x1890 net/smc/af_smc.c:1522
 smc_connect+0x868/0xde0 net/smc/af_smc.c:1702
 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2049 [inline]
 __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2066
 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2076 [inline]
 __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2073 [inline]
 __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2073
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f0b3687d0a9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f0b3764b0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f0b369b3f80 RCX: 00007f0b3687d0a9
RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 00000000200000c0 RDI: 000000000000000a
RBP: 00007f0b368ec074 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f0b369b3f80 R15: 00007fff165a7738
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

             reply	other threads:[~2024-06-26 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-26 19:15 syzbot [this message]
2024-08-07  8:06 ` [syzbot] [net?] [s390?] possible deadlock in smc_vlan_by_tcpsk syzbot
2024-09-12  3:48 ` [syzbot] " syzbot
     [not found] <2adcb13b-c729-4547-ab98-ee2dbc8cd73c@linux.alibaba.com>
2024-09-12  4:15 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0000000000002e944b061bcfd65f@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+c75d1de73d3b8b76272f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.