All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+df3558df41609451e4ac@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linkinjeon@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sj1557.seo@samsung.com,
	 syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [exfat?] possible deadlock in exfat_iterate (2)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 05:58:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000565ec5061bdeafd5@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    55027e689933 Merge tag 'input-for-v6.10-rc5' of git://git...
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16390ac1980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=53ab35b556129242
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=df3558df41609451e4ac
compiler:       gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
userspace arch: i386

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-55027e68.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a36929b5a065/vmlinux-55027e68.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d72de6f61ddc/bzImage-55027e68.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+df3558df41609451e4ac@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-rc5-syzkaller-00018-g55027e689933 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/6265 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8dd3ab20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
ffffffff8dd3ab20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
ffffffff8dd3ab20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
ffffffff8dd3ab20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4121 [inline]
ffffffff8dd3ab20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc_noprof+0xb5/0x420 mm/slub.c:4135

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88804af1a0e0 (&sbi->s_lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: exfat_iterate+0x33f/0xad0 fs/exfat/dir.c:256

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&sbi->s_lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       exfat_evict_inode+0x25b/0x340 fs/exfat/inode.c:725
       evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667
       iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
       iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
       iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
       dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400
       __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603
       shrink_kill fs/dcache.c:1048 [inline]
       shrink_dentry_list+0x140/0x5d0 fs/dcache.c:1075
       prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1156
       super_cache_scan+0x32a/0x550 fs/super.c:221
       do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435
       shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
       shrink_slab+0xa87/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:626
       shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4790
       shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4851 [inline]
       lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4951
       shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5910 [inline]
       kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6720 [inline]
       balance_pgdat+0x1105/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6911
       kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7180
       kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389
       ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

-> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
       __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
       might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
       slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
       slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
       __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4121 [inline]
       __kmalloc_noprof+0xb5/0x420 mm/slub.c:4135
       kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:664 [inline]
       kmalloc_array_noprof include/linux/slab.h:699 [inline]
       __exfat_get_dentry_set+0x81e/0xa90 fs/exfat/dir.c:816
       exfat_get_dentry_set+0x36/0x210 fs/exfat/dir.c:859
       exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry fs/exfat/dir.c:39 [inline]
       exfat_readdir+0x950/0x1520 fs/exfat/dir.c:155
       exfat_iterate+0x3c7/0xad0 fs/exfat/dir.c:261
       wrap_directory_iterator+0xa5/0xe0 fs/readdir.c:67
       iterate_dir+0x53e/0xb60 fs/readdir.c:110
       __do_sys_getdents64 fs/readdir.c:409 [inline]
       __se_sys_getdents64 fs/readdir.c:394 [inline]
       __ia32_sys_getdents64+0x14f/0x2e0 fs/readdir.c:394
       do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
       __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
       do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
       entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&sbi->s_lock#2);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(&sbi->s_lock#2);
  lock(fs_reclaim);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz-executor.2/6265:
 #0: ffff88801db114c8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0xeb/0x180 fs/file.c:1191
 #1: ffff8880483da9e8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#24){++++}-{3:3}, at: wrap_directory_iterator+0x5a/0xe0 fs/readdir.c:56
 #2: ffff88804af1a0e0 (&sbi->s_lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: exfat_iterate+0x33f/0xad0 fs/exfat/dir.c:256

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 6265 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-syzkaller-00018-g55027e689933 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
 check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
 slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4121 [inline]
 __kmalloc_noprof+0xb5/0x420 mm/slub.c:4135
 kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:664 [inline]
 kmalloc_array_noprof include/linux/slab.h:699 [inline]
 __exfat_get_dentry_set+0x81e/0xa90 fs/exfat/dir.c:816
 exfat_get_dentry_set+0x36/0x210 fs/exfat/dir.c:859
 exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry fs/exfat/dir.c:39 [inline]
 exfat_readdir+0x950/0x1520 fs/exfat/dir.c:155
 exfat_iterate+0x3c7/0xad0 fs/exfat/dir.c:261
 wrap_directory_iterator+0xa5/0xe0 fs/readdir.c:67
 iterate_dir+0x53e/0xb60 fs/readdir.c:110
 __do_sys_getdents64 fs/readdir.c:409 [inline]
 __se_sys_getdents64 fs/readdir.c:394 [inline]
 __ia32_sys_getdents64+0x14f/0x2e0 fs/readdir.c:394
 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
 __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
RIP: 0023:0xf72f8579
Code: b8 01 10 06 03 74 b4 01 10 07 03 74 b0 01 10 08 03 74 d8 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90 90 90 90 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00000000f5ec95ac EFLAGS: 00000292 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000dc
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000a RCX: 0000000020002ec0
RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000292 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
 </TASK>
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess), 2 bytes skipped:
   0:	10 06                	adc    %al,(%rsi)
   2:	03 74 b4 01          	add    0x1(%rsp,%rsi,4),%esi
   6:	10 07                	adc    %al,(%rdi)
   8:	03 74 b0 01          	add    0x1(%rax,%rsi,4),%esi
   c:	10 08                	adc    %cl,(%rax)
   e:	03 74 d8 01          	add    0x1(%rax,%rbx,8),%esi
  1e:	00 51 52             	add    %dl,0x52(%rcx)
  21:	55                   	push   %rbp
  22:	89 e5                	mov    %esp,%ebp
  24:	0f 34                	sysenter
  26:	cd 80                	int    $0x80
* 28:	5d                   	pop    %rbp <-- trapping instruction
  29:	5a                   	pop    %rdx
  2a:	59                   	pop    %rcx
  2b:	c3                   	ret
  2c:	90                   	nop
  2d:	90                   	nop
  2e:	90                   	nop
  2f:	90                   	nop
  30:	8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 	lea    0x0(%rsi,%riz,1),%esi
  37:	8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 	lea    0x0(%rsi,%riz,1),%esi


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

             reply	other threads:[~2024-06-27 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-27 12:58 syzbot [this message]
2024-06-27 23:13 ` [syzbot] [exfat?] possible deadlock in exfat_iterate (2) Namjae Jeon
2024-06-27 23:13   ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=000000000000565ec5061bdeafd5@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+df3558df41609451e4ac@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.