From: syzbot <syzbot+850ca6a3ba35c8699832@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
jakub@cloudflare.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in sock_map_unref
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 07:20:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000008a882a061596826d@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: f99c5f563c17 Merge tag 'nf-24-03-21' of git://git.kernel.o..
git tree: net
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1363aaa9180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=6fb1be60a193d440
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=850ca6a3ba35c8699832
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/65d3f3eb786e/disk-f99c5f56.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/799cf7f28ff8/vmlinux-f99c5f56.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/ab26c60c3845/bzImage-f99c5f56.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+850ca6a3ba35c8699832@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.4/21902 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88804ec83bf0 (clock-AF_UNIX){++..}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:163 [inline]
ffff88804ec83bf0 (clock-AF_UNIX){++..}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_unref+0x442/0x5e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888066451200 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff888066451200 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_update_common+0x1b6/0x5b0 net/core/sock_map.c:490
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}:
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
__sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:414 [inline]
sock_map_delete_elem+0x97/0x140 net/core/sock_map.c:446
0xffffffffa00048e6
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_kfree include/trace/events/kmem.h:94 [inline]
kfree+0x291/0x380 mm/slub.c:4396
__bpf_prog_put_noref+0xd7/0x310 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2244
bpf_prog_put_deferred+0x2f3/0x3e0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2270
__bpf_prog_put kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2282 [inline]
bpf_prog_put+0x264/0x2a0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2289
psock_set_prog include/linux/skmsg.h:475 [inline]
sk_psock_stop_strp net/core/skmsg.c:1156 [inline]
sk_psock_drop+0xe0/0x500 net/core/skmsg.c:841
sk_psock_put include/linux/skmsg.h:459 [inline]
sock_map_close+0x209/0x2d0 net/core/sock_map.c:1648
unix_release+0x85/0xc0 net/unix/af_unix.c:1048
__sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]
sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421
__fput+0x429/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:423
__do_sys_close fs/open.c:1557 [inline]
__se_sys_close fs/open.c:1542 [inline]
__x64_sys_close+0x7f/0x110 fs/open.c:1542
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
-> #0 (clock-AF_UNIX){++..}-{2:2}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_write_lock_bh include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:202 [inline]
_raw_write_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:334
sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:163 [inline]
sock_map_unref+0x442/0x5e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
sock_map_update_common+0x4f0/0x5b0 net/core/sock_map.c:503
sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x55f/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:579
map_update_elem+0x53a/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641
__sys_bpf+0x76f/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5619
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&stab->lock);
lock(clock-AF_UNIX);
lock(&stab->lock);
lock(clock-AF_UNIX);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz-executor.4/21902:
#0: ffff88804ec85a58 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1671 [inline]
#0: ffff88804ec85a58 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_map_sk_acquire net/core/sock_map.c:117 [inline]
#0: ffff88804ec85a58 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x1cc/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:575
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: sock_map_sk_acquire net/core/sock_map.c:118 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e131920 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x1d8/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:575
#2: ffff888066451200 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
#2: ffff888066451200 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_update_common+0x1b6/0x5b0 net/core/sock_map.c:490
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 21902 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-05271-gf99c5f563c17 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2e0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_write_lock_bh include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:202 [inline]
_raw_write_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:334
sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:163 [inline]
sock_map_unref+0x442/0x5e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
sock_map_update_common+0x4f0/0x5b0 net/core/sock_map.c:503
sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x55f/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:579
map_update_elem+0x53a/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641
__sys_bpf+0x76f/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5619
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
RIP: 0033:0x7f9934c7de69
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f9935a7c0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9934dac120 RCX: 00007f9934c7de69
RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 0000000020000880 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: 00007f9934cca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007f9934dac120 R15: 00007fffdd7d6668
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0000000000008a882a061596826d@google.com \
--to=syzbot+850ca6a3ba35c8699832@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.