From: syzbot <syzbot+b4567a8b2d2ad5f9dd06@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, tj@kernel.org
Subject: [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in walk_component (4)
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:16:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000931657061ffc8ad9@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 6b0f8db921ab Merge tag 'execve-v6.11-rc4' of git://git.ker..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16766c05980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=54e9d4be0c7a0d11
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b4567a8b2d2ad5f9dd06
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-6b0f8db9.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/5829b92d3000/vmlinux-6b0f8db9.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/0b382f2bc118/bzImage-6b0f8db9.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+b4567a8b2d2ad5f9dd06@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00013-g6b0f8db921ab #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.2542/15091 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888047e58cf8 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:809 [inline]
ffff888047e58cf8 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}, at: lookup_slow fs/namei.c:1734 [inline]
ffff888047e58cf8 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}, at: walk_component+0x342/0x5b0 fs/namei.c:2039
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880484c6488 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x281/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:325
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x281/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:325
iter_file_splice_write+0x906/0x10b0 fs/splice.c:743
do_splice_from fs/splice.c:941 [inline]
do_splice+0x148c/0x1f90 fs/splice.c:1354
__do_splice+0x327/0x360 fs/splice.c:1436
__do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1652 [inline]
__se_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1634 [inline]
__x64_sys_splice+0x1d2/0x260 fs/splice.c:1634
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #2 (&pipe->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
pipe_lock fs/pipe.c:92 [inline]
pipe_lock+0x64/0x80 fs/pipe.c:89
iter_file_splice_write+0x1f0/0x10b0 fs/splice.c:687
do_splice_from fs/splice.c:941 [inline]
do_splice+0x148c/0x1f90 fs/splice.c:1354
__do_splice+0x327/0x360 fs/splice.c:1436
__do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1652 [inline]
__se_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1634 [inline]
__x64_sys_splice+0x1d2/0x260 fs/splice.c:1634
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1675 [inline]
sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1811 [inline]
mnt_want_write+0x6f/0x450 fs/namespace.c:515
ovl_create_object+0x12e/0x300 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:642
lookup_open.isra.0+0x10a1/0x13c0 fs/namei.c:3578
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3647 [inline]
path_openat+0xa3b/0x2d20 fs/namei.c:3883
do_filp_open+0x1dc/0x430 fs/namei.c:3913
do_sys_openat2+0x17a/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1416
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1431 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1447 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1442 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x175/0x210 fs/open.c:1442
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x24ed/0x3cb0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724
down_read+0x9a/0x330 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:809 [inline]
lookup_slow fs/namei.c:1734 [inline]
walk_component+0x342/0x5b0 fs/namei.c:2039
lookup_last fs/namei.c:2542 [inline]
path_lookupat+0x17f/0x770 fs/namei.c:2566
filename_lookup+0x1e5/0x5b0 fs/namei.c:2595
kern_path+0x35/0x50 fs/namei.c:2703
lookup_bdev+0xd9/0x280 block/bdev.c:1157
resume_store+0x1d8/0x460 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1235
kobj_attr_store+0x55/0x80 lib/kobject.c:840
sysfs_kf_write+0x117/0x170 fs/sysfs/file.c:136
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x343/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
vfs_write+0x6b6/0x1140 fs/read_write.c:590
ksys_write+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth] --> &pipe->mutex --> &of->mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&of->mutex);
lock(&pipe->mutex);
lock(&of->mutex);
rlock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]);
*** DEADLOCK ***
4 locks held by syz.0.2542/15091:
#0: ffff8880298c19c8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0xeb/0x180 fs/file.c:1187
#1: ffff888024928420 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643
#2: ffff8880484c6488 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x281/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:325
#3: ffff888016744698 (kn->active#77){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2a4/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:326
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 15091 Comm: syz.0.2542 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00013-g6b0f8db921ab #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2186
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x24ed/0x3cb0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724
down_read+0x9a/0x330 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:809 [inline]
lookup_slow fs/namei.c:1734 [inline]
walk_component+0x342/0x5b0 fs/namei.c:2039
lookup_last fs/namei.c:2542 [inline]
path_lookupat+0x17f/0x770 fs/namei.c:2566
filename_lookup+0x1e5/0x5b0 fs/namei.c:2595
kern_path+0x35/0x50 fs/namei.c:2703
lookup_bdev+0xd9/0x280 block/bdev.c:1157
resume_store+0x1d8/0x460 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1235
kobj_attr_store+0x55/0x80 lib/kobject.c:840
sysfs_kf_write+0x117/0x170 fs/sysfs/file.c:136
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x343/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
vfs_write+0x6b6/0x1140 fs/read_write.c:590
ksys_write+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7efcd1f799f9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007efcd2d56038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007efcd2115f80 RCX: 00007efcd1f799f9
RDX: 0000000000000012 RSI: 0000000020000140 RDI: 0000000000000009
RBP: 00007efcd1fe78ee R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007efcd2115f80 R15: 00007ffdbb59c4e8
</TASK>
PM: Image not found (code -6)
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-18 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-18 22:16 syzbot [this message]
2025-02-02 18:56 ` [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in walk_component (4) syzbot
2025-02-03 8:39 ` Hillf Danton
2025-02-03 9:03 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=000000000000931657061ffc8ad9@google.com \
--to=syzbot+b4567a8b2d2ad5f9dd06@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.