From: syzbot <syzbot+4ef9e52e464c6ff47d9d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, josef@toxicpanda.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in btrfs_search_slot_get_root
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2022 15:49:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000009abbbf05ecd5f687@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: bbed346d5a96 Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=163a7961880000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3a4a45d2d827c1e
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4ef9e52e464c6ff47d9d
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e8e91bc79312/disk-bbed346d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c1cb3fb3b77e/vmlinux-bbed346d.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+4ef9e52e464c6ff47d9d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
BTRFS info (device loop5): enabling ssd optimizations
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.5/14151 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000c916fad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x54/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5576
but task is already holding lock:
ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read_nested+0x64/0x84 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1624
__btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x74/0x338 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1637
btrfs_search_slot+0x1b0/0xfd8 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1944
__lookup_free_space_inode fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:69 [inline]
lookup_free_space_inode+0xc4/0x2ac fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:116
btrfs_remove_free_space_inode+0x88/0x1e8 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:230
cleanup_free_space_cache_v1 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:4079 [inline]
btrfs_set_free_space_cache_v1_active+0xc0/0x238 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:4107
btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x238/0x380 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3251
open_ctree+0xd28/0xf84 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3732
btrfs_fill_super+0xc0/0x174 fs/btrfs/super.c:1456
btrfs_mount_root+0x4a4/0x558 fs/btrfs/super.c:1824
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x74 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x40/0x140 fs/super.c:1530
fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1043 [inline]
vfs_kern_mount+0xe0/0x140 fs/namespace.c:1073
btrfs_mount+0x20c/0x5e8 fs/btrfs/super.c:1884
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x74 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x40/0x140 fs/super.c:1530
do_new_mount+0x1dc/0x4e4 fs/namespace.c:3040
path_mount+0x358/0x914 fs/namespace.c:3370
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mount+0x2c4/0x3c4 fs/namespace.c:3568
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
-> #1 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1826 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1948 [inline]
start_transaction+0x360/0x944 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:683
btrfs_join_transaction+0x30/0x40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:795
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x50/0x140 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6103
btrfs_update_time+0x1c0/0x1e8 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6145
inode_update_time fs/inode.c:1872 [inline]
touch_atime+0x1f0/0x4a8 fs/inode.c:1945
file_accessed include/linux/fs.h:2516 [inline]
btrfs_file_mmap+0x50/0x88 fs/btrfs/file.c:2407
call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2192 [inline]
mmap_region+0x7fc/0xc14 mm/mmap.c:1752
do_mmap+0x644/0x97c mm/mmap.c:1540
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xe8/0x1d0 mm/util.c:552
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1cc/0x278 mm/mmap.c:1586
__do_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:28 [inline]
__se_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mmap+0x58/0x6c arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
__might_fault+0x7c/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5577
_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:134 [inline]
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:160 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_rootref+0x3a8/0x4bc fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3203
btrfs_ioctl+0xa08/0xa64 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5556
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-root-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(sb_internal#2);
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor.5/14151:
#0: ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
#0: ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
#0: ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 14151 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/30/2022
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156
show_stack+0x2c/0x54 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2053
check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
__might_fault+0x7c/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5577
_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:134 [inline]
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:160 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_rootref+0x3a8/0x4bc fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3203
btrfs_ioctl+0xa08/0xa64 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5556
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-06 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-06 23:49 syzbot [this message]
2022-11-07 0:04 ` [syzbot] possible deadlock in btrfs_search_slot_get_root syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0000000000009abbbf05ecd5f687@google.com \
--to=syzbot+4ef9e52e464c6ff47d9d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.