All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+1fa663a2100308ab6eab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: hdanton@sina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] possible deadlock in kvfree_call_rcu
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 22:43:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000a5ee4e0614ee586e@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240330234217.3169-1-hdanton@sina.com>

Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in hrtimer_start_range_ns

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/5489 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880b952c8d8 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: lock_hrtimer_base kernel/time/hrtimer.c:175 [inline]
ffff8880b952c8d8 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: hrtimer_start_range_ns+0xdf/0xc60 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1303

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802195e9f8 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_update_elem+0xcb/0xc10 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:324

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
       lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
       _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
       trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:451
       0xffffffffa00060ce
       bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
       __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
       bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
       __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
       bpf_trace_run2+0x204/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
       trace_hrtimer_start include/trace/events/timer.h:222 [inline]
       debug_activate kernel/time/hrtimer.c:479 [inline]
       enqueue_hrtimer+0x335/0x3a0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1090
       __hrtimer_start_range_ns kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1265 [inline]
       hrtimer_start_range_ns+0xaa0/0xc60 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1305
       futex_wait_queue+0xb0/0x1d0 kernel/futex/waitwake.c:357
       __futex_wait+0x17f/0x320 kernel/futex/waitwake.c:669
       futex_wait+0x101/0x360 kernel/futex/waitwake.c:697
       do_futex+0x33b/0x560 kernel/futex/syscalls.c:102
       __do_sys_futex kernel/futex/syscalls.c:179 [inline]
       __se_sys_futex+0x3f9/0x480 kernel/futex/syscalls.c:160
       do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

-> #0 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
       __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
       lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
       _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
       lock_hrtimer_base kernel/time/hrtimer.c:175 [inline]
       hrtimer_start_range_ns+0xdf/0xc60 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1303
       hrtimer_start include/linux/hrtimer.h:275 [inline]
       run_page_cache_worker kernel/rcu/tree.c:3342 [inline]
       kvfree_call_rcu+0x60e/0x7c0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3447
       trie_update_elem+0x819/0xc10 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:385
       bpf_map_update_value+0x4d3/0x540 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:203
       generic_map_update_batch+0x60d/0x900 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1876
       bpf_map_do_batch+0x3e0/0x690 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5145
       __sys_bpf+0x377/0x810
       __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]
       __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]
       __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736
       do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&trie->lock);
                               lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);
                               lock(&trie->lock);
  lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz-executor.0/5489:
 #0: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:298 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:750 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_map_update_value+0x3c4/0x540 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:202
 #1: ffff88802195e9f8 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_update_elem+0xcb/0xc10 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:324
 #2: ffff8880b9529470 (krc.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: krc_this_cpu_lock kernel/rcu/tree.c:2960 [inline]
 #2: ffff8880b9529470 (krc.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock kernel/rcu/tree.c:3360 [inline]
 #2: ffff8880b9529470 (krc.lock){....}-{2:2}, at: kvfree_call_rcu+0x192/0x7c0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3445

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 5489 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e-dirty #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
 lock_hrtimer_base kernel/time/hrtimer.c:175 [inline]
 hrtimer_start_range_ns+0xdf/0xc60 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1303
 hrtimer_start include/linux/hrtimer.h:275 [inline]
 run_page_cache_worker kernel/rcu/tree.c:3342 [inline]
 kvfree_call_rcu+0x60e/0x7c0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3447
 trie_update_elem+0x819/0xc10 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:385
 bpf_map_update_value+0x4d3/0x540 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:203
 generic_map_update_batch+0x60d/0x900 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1876
 bpf_map_do_batch+0x3e0/0x690 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5145
 __sys_bpf+0x377/0x810
 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]
 __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]
 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736
 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
RIP: 0033:0x7f44a5a7dda9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f44a686a0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f44a5babf80 RCX: 00007f44a5a7dda9
RDX: 0000000000000038 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 000000000000001a
RBP: 00007f44a5aca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f44a5babf80 R15: 00007ffc1ffeb058
 </TASK>


Tested on:

commit:         fe46a7dd Merge tag 'sound-6.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel..
git tree:       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=148dffe6180000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=fe78468a74fdc3b7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1fa663a2100308ab6eab
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
patch:          https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=15a5ffe6180000


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-31  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-26 19:00 [syzbot] [bpf?] possible deadlock in kvfree_call_rcu syzbot
2024-03-26 19:53 ` false positive deadlock? Was: " Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-27  4:37   ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-27  5:04     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-28  0:12       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-27 23:27 ` syzbot
2024-03-28 23:07   ` Hillf Danton
2024-03-29 16:17     ` syzbot
2024-03-30  0:27   ` Hillf Danton
2024-03-30 15:34     ` syzbot
2024-03-30 23:42   ` Hillf Danton
2024-03-30 23:42     ` Hillf Danton
2024-03-31  5:43     ` syzbot [this message]
2024-03-31  6:19   ` Hillf Danton
2024-03-31  7:03     ` syzbot
2024-03-31  7:03       ` syzbot
2024-03-30 17:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-03-31  6:23   ` Hillf Danton
2024-03-31  6:23     ` Hillf Danton
2024-03-31  7:25     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-03-31  6:28 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-03-31  6:54   ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=000000000000a5ee4e0614ee586e@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+1fa663a2100308ab6eab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.