From: syzbot <syzbot+d78497256d53041ee229@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: jlbec@evilplan.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark@fasheh.com,
ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [ocfs2?] possible deadlock in ocfs2_setattr
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:40:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000ae358c06202ca726@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 521b1e7f4cf0 Merge tag 'cxl-fixes-6.11-rc5' of git://git.k..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=175453cb980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=df2f0ed7e30a639d
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d78497256d53041ee229
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1395e991980000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=13659d6b980000
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-521b1e7f.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/fc256e887f7f/vmlinux-521b1e7f.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/0ecca3914e31/bzImage-521b1e7f.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4ad0fdc1f43e/mount_0.gz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+d78497256d53041ee229@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
JBD2: Ignoring recovery information on journal
ocfs2: Mounting device (7,0) on (node local, slot 0) with writeback data mode.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00011-g521b1e7f4cf0 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor408/5110 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888037bf6610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ocfs2_setattr+0xcb1/0x1f50 fs/ocfs2/file.c:1259
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88803c2bcda0 (&oi->ip_alloc_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_setattr+0xc9f/0x1f50 fs/ocfs2/file.c:1258
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #4 (&oi->ip_alloc_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579
ocfs2_try_remove_refcount_tree+0xb6/0x330 fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c:931
ocfs2_xattr_set+0xa4f/0x1930 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:3670
ocfs2_set_acl+0x4cb/0x580 fs/ocfs2/acl.c:254
ocfs2_iop_set_acl+0x24a/0x3c0 fs/ocfs2/acl.c:286
set_posix_acl fs/posix_acl.c:955 [inline]
vfs_set_acl+0x7fd/0xa60 fs/posix_acl.c:1134
do_setxattr fs/xattr.c:626 [inline]
path_setxattr+0x3bd/0x4d0 fs/xattr.c:658
__do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:676 [inline]
__se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:672 [inline]
__x64_sys_setxattr+0xbb/0xd0 fs/xattr.c:672
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #3 (&oi->ip_xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
ocfs2_init_acl+0x397/0x930 fs/ocfs2/acl.c:366
ocfs2_mknod+0x1c05/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:408
ocfs2_create+0x1ab/0x480 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:672
vfs_create+0x23c/0x3d0 fs/namei.c:3280
do_mknodat+0x447/0x5b0 fs/namei.c:4138
__do_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4166 [inline]
__se_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4163 [inline]
__x64_sys_mknodat+0xa7/0xc0 fs/namei.c:4163
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #2 (jbd2_handle){.+.+}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
start_this_handle+0x1eb4/0x2110 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:448
jbd2__journal_start+0x2da/0x5d0 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:505
jbd2_journal_start+0x29/0x40 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:544
ocfs2_start_trans+0x3c9/0x700 fs/ocfs2/journal.c:352
ocfs2_mknod+0x150c/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:359
ocfs2_create+0x1ab/0x480 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:672
vfs_create+0x23c/0x3d0 fs/namei.c:3280
do_mknodat+0x447/0x5b0 fs/namei.c:4138
__do_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4166 [inline]
__se_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4163 [inline]
__x64_sys_mknodat+0xa7/0xc0 fs/namei.c:4163
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (&journal->j_trans_barrier){.+.+}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
ocfs2_start_trans+0x3be/0x700 fs/ocfs2/journal.c:350
ocfs2_mknod+0x150c/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:359
ocfs2_create+0x1ab/0x480 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:672
vfs_create+0x23c/0x3d0 fs/namei.c:3280
do_mknodat+0x447/0x5b0 fs/namei.c:4138
__do_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4166 [inline]
__se_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4163 [inline]
__x64_sys_mknodat+0xa7/0xc0 fs/namei.c:4163
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1675 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1858 [inline]
ocfs2_start_trans+0x2b9/0x700 fs/ocfs2/journal.c:348
ocfs2_setattr+0xcb1/0x1f50 fs/ocfs2/file.c:1259
notify_change+0xb9d/0xe70 fs/attr.c:495
chmod_common+0x2ab/0x4c0 fs/open.c:654
do_fchmodat fs/open.c:702 [inline]
__do_sys_fchmodat fs/open.c:721 [inline]
__se_sys_fchmodat fs/open.c:718 [inline]
__x64_sys_fchmodat+0x11d/0x1c0 fs/open.c:718
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
sb_internal#2 --> &oi->ip_xattr_sem --> &oi->ip_alloc_sem
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
lock(&oi->ip_xattr_sem);
lock(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
rlock(sb_internal#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz-executor408/5110:
#0: ffff888037bf6420 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:515
#1: ffff88803c2bd100 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:799 [inline]
#1: ffff88803c2bd100 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: chmod_common+0x1bb/0x4c0 fs/open.c:648
#2: ffff88803c2bcda0 (&oi->ip_alloc_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_setattr+0xc9f/0x1f50 fs/ocfs2/file.c:1258
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5110 Comm: syz-executor408 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00011-g521b1e7f4cf0 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2186
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1675 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1858 [inline]
ocfs2_start_trans+0x2b9/0x700 fs/ocfs2/journal.c:348
ocfs2_setattr+0xcb1/0x1f50 fs/ocfs2/file.c:1259
notify_change+0xb9d/0xe70 fs/attr.c:495
chmod_common+0x2ab/0x4c0 fs/open.c:654
do_fchmodat fs/open.c:702 [inline]
__do_sys_fchmodat fs/open.c:721 [inline]
__se_sys_fchmodat fs/open.c:718 [inline]
__x64_sys_fchmodat+0x11d/0x1c0 fs/open.c:718
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7ff865822659
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fffa6552a68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000010c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007ff865822659
RDX: 00000000000001ff RSI: 0000000020000440 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fffa6552aa0
R10: 00007fffa6552a70 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fffa6552aa0
R13: 00007fffa6552d28 R14: 431bde82d7b634db R15: 00007ff86586b03b
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-21 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 7:40 syzbot [this message]
2024-08-21 9:34 ` [syzbot] [ocfs2?] possible deadlock in ocfs2_setattr Edward Adam Davis
2024-08-21 10:07 ` syzbot
2024-10-22 15:31 ` syzbot
2024-10-23 2:55 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=000000000000ae358c06202ca726@google.com \
--to=syzbot+d78497256d53041ee229@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.