All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+34658a0f0144bec77d8d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	 kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,  pabeni@redhat.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in ipv6_sock_mc_close (2)
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 06:13:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000b9e4d4062136d265@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    43d0035b2c6a Merge branch 'unmask-dscp-bits'
git tree:       net-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10c73b33980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=996585887acdadb3
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=34658a0f0144bec77d8d
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d9ee2f9a24bd/disk-43d0035b.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/45ba9b6d0285/vmlinux-43d0035b.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/23448fef5f65/bzImage-43d0035b.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+34658a0f0144bec77d8d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

IPVS: stopping backup sync thread 11551 ...
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.11.0-rc5-syzkaller-00764-g43d0035b2c6a #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.2.1876/12083 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8fc8c048 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ipv6_sock_mc_close+0xc9/0x140 net/ipv6/mcast.c:354

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88805f5ef850 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3056

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xdb0 net/smc/af_smc.c:902
       smc_sendmsg+0x11f/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2771
       sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
       __sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745
       __sys_sendto+0x3a4/0x4f0 net/socket.c:2204
       __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2216 [inline]
       __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2212 [inline]
       __x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2212
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
       lock_sock_nested+0x48/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3543
       do_ip_setsockopt+0x1a2d/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1078
       ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
       do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2324
       __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2347
       __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2356 [inline]
       __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2353 [inline]
       __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2353
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
       __lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       ipv6_sock_mc_close+0xc9/0x140 net/ipv6/mcast.c:354
       inet6_release+0x47/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:484
       __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]
       sock_release+0x82/0x150 net/socket.c:687
       stop_sync_thread+0x4e6/0x5e0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:2004
       do_ip_vs_set_ctl+0x47b/0x13d0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:2734
       nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101
       smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
       do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2324
       __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2347
       __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2356 [inline]
       __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2353 [inline]
       __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2353
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET --> &smc->clcsock_release_lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
                               lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
                               lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
  lock(rtnl_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz.2.1876/12083:
 #0: ffff88805f5ef850 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3056

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 12083 Comm: syz.2.1876 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-syzkaller-00764-g43d0035b2c6a #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2186
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
 __lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
 ipv6_sock_mc_close+0xc9/0x140 net/ipv6/mcast.c:354
 inet6_release+0x47/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:484
 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]
 sock_release+0x82/0x150 net/socket.c:687
 stop_sync_thread+0x4e6/0x5e0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:2004
 do_ip_vs_set_ctl+0x47b/0x13d0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:2734
 nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101
 smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
 do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2324
 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2347
 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2356 [inline]
 __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2353 [inline]
 __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2353
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fc693f79eb9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fc6939ff038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fc694116058 RCX: 00007fc693f79eb9
RDX: 000000000000048c RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007fc693fe793e R08: 0000000000000018 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00000000200002c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fc694116058 R15: 00007ffcf1815ee8
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

                 reply	other threads:[~2024-09-03 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=000000000000b9e4d4062136d265@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+34658a0f0144bec77d8d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.