From: syzbot <syzbot+a4ed4041b9bea8177ac3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
jakub@cloudflare.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in __sock_map_delete
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 03:15:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000bafb9f06160bc800@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: e8c39d0f57f3 Merge tag 'probes-fixes-v6.9-rc3' of git://gi..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16d1ef13180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=285be8dd6baeb438
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a4ed4041b9bea8177ac3
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-e8c39d0f.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d33b002ae0bf/vmlinux-e8c39d0f.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/047d0bfb2db7/bzImage-e8c39d0f.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+a4ed4041b9bea8177ac3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.9.0-rc3-syzkaller-00073-ge8c39d0f57f3 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u32:0/10 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888024dbea00 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff888024dbea00 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __sock_map_delete+0x43/0xe0 net/core/sock_map.c:417
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880260e5290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff8880260e5290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:145 [inline]
ffff8880260e5290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_unref+0xbf/0x6e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}:
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x33/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_map_add_link net/core/sock_map.c:134 [inline]
sock_map_update_common+0x622/0x870 net/core/sock_map.c:503
sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x3bb/0x570 net/core/sock_map.c:582
bpf_map_update_value+0x36c/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:172
map_update_elem+0x623/0x910 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641
__sys_bpf+0xab9/0x4b40 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5648
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5767 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x78/0xc0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x260 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x33/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
__sock_map_delete+0x43/0xe0 net/core/sock_map.c:417
sock_map_delete_elem+0xb5/0x100 net/core/sock_map.c:449
___bpf_prog_run+0x3e51/0xabd0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997
__bpf_prog_run32+0xc1/0x100 kernel/bpf/core.c:2236
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x151/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_kfree include/trace/events/kmem.h:94 [inline]
kfree+0x225/0x390 mm/slub.c:4377
sk_psock_free_link include/linux/skmsg.h:421 [inline]
sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:158 [inline]
sock_map_unref+0x392/0x6e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
sock_map_free+0x260/0x470 net/core/sock_map.c:351
bpf_map_free_deferred+0x1ce/0x420 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:734
process_one_work+0x9a9/0x1ac0 kernel/workqueue.c:3254
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline]
worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&psock->link_lock);
lock(&stab->lock);
lock(&psock->link_lock);
lock(&stab->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/10:
#0: ffff888015091148 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1296/0x1ac0 kernel/workqueue.c:3229
#1: ffffc900000d7d80 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x906/0x1ac0 kernel/workqueue.c:3230
#2: ffff88802556ea58 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1671 [inline]
#2: ffff88802556ea58 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_map_free+0x20f/0x470 net/core/sock_map.c:349
#3: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: sock_map_free+0x231/0x470 net/core/sock_map.c:350
#4: ffff8880260e5290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
#4: ffff8880260e5290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:145 [inline]
#4: ffff8880260e5290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_unref+0xbf/0x6e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
#5: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2380 [inline]
#5: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0xe4/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-syzkaller-00073-ge8c39d0f57f3 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x33/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
__sock_map_delete+0x43/0xe0 net/core/sock_map.c:417
sock_map_delete_elem+0xb5/0x100 net/core/sock_map.c:449
___bpf_prog_run+0x3e51/0xabd0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997
__bpf_prog_run32+0xc1/0x100 kernel/bpf/core.c:2236
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x151/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_kfree include/trace/events/kmem.h:94 [inline]
kfree+0x225/0x390 mm/slub.c:4377
sk_psock_free_link include/linux/skmsg.h:421 [inline]
sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:158 [inline]
sock_map_unref+0x392/0x6e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
sock_map_free+0x260/0x470 net/core/sock_map.c:351
bpf_map_free_deferred+0x1ce/0x420 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:734
process_one_work+0x9a9/0x1ac0 kernel/workqueue.c:3254
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline]
worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-14 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-14 10:15 syzbot [this message]
2024-04-22 12:45 ` [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in __sock_map_delete syzbot
2024-05-12 5:56 ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-05-12 6:20 ` syzbot
2024-06-29 13:45 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=000000000000bafb9f06160bc800@google.com \
--to=syzbot+a4ed4041b9bea8177ac3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.