All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+c319bb5b1014113a92cf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in reiserfs_dirty_inode
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 02:04:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000cfe6f305ee84ff1f@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    faf68e3523c2 Merge tag 'kbuild-fixes-v6.1-4' of git://git...
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11078bc5880000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=436ee340148d5197
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c319bb5b1014113a92cf
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4aefb045a8ae/disk-faf68e35.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c799b03718cc/vmlinux-faf68e35.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/3f6af9278460/bzImage-faf68e35.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+c319bb5b1014113a92cf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-00315-gfaf68e3523c2 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.3/21593 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888027069718 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0xa9/0x180 mm/memory.c:5645

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880a24f2090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x79/0x100 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
       reiserfs_write_lock+0x79/0x100 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
       reiserfs_dirty_inode+0xd2/0x260 fs/reiserfs/super.c:704
       __mark_inode_dirty+0x247/0x11e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2408
       generic_update_time fs/inode.c:1859 [inline]
       inode_update_time fs/inode.c:1872 [inline]
       touch_atime+0x641/0x700 fs/inode.c:1944
       file_accessed include/linux/fs.h:2521 [inline]
       generic_file_mmap+0x119/0x150 mm/filemap.c:3454
       call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2196 [inline]
       mmap_region+0x6c3/0x1dd0 mm/mmap.c:2625
       do_mmap+0x831/0xf60 mm/mmap.c:1412
       vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1af/0x280 mm/util.c:520
       ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x41f/0x5a0 mm/mmap.c:1458
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
       __might_fault mm/memory.c:5646 [inline]
       __might_fault+0x10c/0x180 mm/memory.c:5639
       reiserfs_ioctl+0x1d2/0x330 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:96
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&sbi->lock);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
                               lock(&sbi->lock);
  lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.3/21593:
 #0: ffff8880a24f2090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x79/0x100 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 21593 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-00315-gfaf68e3523c2 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xd1/0x138 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
 __might_fault mm/memory.c:5646 [inline]
 __might_fault+0x10c/0x180 mm/memory.c:5639
 reiserfs_ioctl+0x1d2/0x330 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:96
 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
 __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f5a0608c0d9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f5a06d55168 EFLAGS: 00000246
 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f5a061ac050 RCX: 00007f5a0608c0d9
RDX: 00000000200001c0 RSI: 0000000080087601 RDI: 0000000000000007
RBP: 00007f5a060e7ae9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffdba33ed3f R14: 00007f5a06d55300 R15: 0000000000022000
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-28 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-28 10:04 syzbot [this message]
2023-07-13  2:00 ` [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in reiserfs_dirty_inode syzbot
2023-11-06  8:34 ` syzbot
2023-11-06 22:53   ` Paul Moore
2023-11-07 11:03     ` Roberto Sassu
2023-11-07 22:26       ` Paul Moore
2023-11-08  8:00         ` Roberto Sassu
2024-03-09  9:59 ` syzbot
2024-03-10  0:54   ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=000000000000cfe6f305ee84ff1f@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+c319bb5b1014113a92cf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.