From: syzbot <syzbot+d3bb749184481f92deb5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: hdanton@sina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [ext4?] possible deadlock in ext4_find_inline_entry
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 01:52:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000d20e4a05f0f470e1@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221229093654.2868-1-hdanton@sina.com>
Hello,
syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in ext4_find_inline_entry
EXT4-fs: Warning: mounting with an experimental mount option 'dioread_nolock' for blocksize < PAGE_SIZE
EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem without journal. Quota mode: none.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-rc8-syzkaller-00172-ga5541c0811a0-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/3645 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000caafc428 (&ei->xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: ext4_find_inline_entry+0x80/0x224 fs/ext4/inline.c:1690
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000caafbdc0 (&ea_inode->i_lockkey){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:757 [inline]
ffff0000caafbdc0 (&ea_inode->i_lockkey){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vfs_unlink+0x78/0x300 fs/namei.c:4241
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&ea_inode->i_lockkey){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write+0x5c/0x88 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1562
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:757 [inline]
ext4_xattr_inode_create fs/ext4/xattr.c:1455 [inline]
ext4_xattr_inode_lookup_create fs/ext4/xattr.c:1538 [inline]
ext4_xattr_set_entry+0xdf0/0xe34 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1666
ext4_xattr_ibody_set+0x94/0x184 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2226
ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x648/0x9a0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2383
ext4_xattr_set+0x100/0x1d0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2497
ext4_xattr_trusted_set+0x4c/0x64 fs/ext4/xattr_trusted.c:38
__vfs_setxattr+0x250/0x260 fs/xattr.c:182
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0xcc/0x320 fs/xattr.c:216
__vfs_setxattr_locked+0x16c/0x194 fs/xattr.c:277
vfs_setxattr+0xf4/0x1f4 fs/xattr.c:309
do_setxattr fs/xattr.c:594 [inline]
setxattr fs/xattr.c:617 [inline]
path_setxattr+0x354/0x414 fs/xattr.c:636
__do_sys_lsetxattr fs/xattr.c:659 [inline]
__se_sys_lsetxattr fs/xattr.c:655 [inline]
__arm64_sys_lsetxattr+0x2c/0x40 fs/xattr.c:655
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x140 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:197
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
-> #0 (&ei->xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x3084 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
down_read+0x5c/0x78 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1509
ext4_find_inline_entry+0x80/0x224 fs/ext4/inline.c:1690
__ext4_find_entry+0xe8/0xb4c fs/ext4/namei.c:1596
ext4_find_entry fs/ext4/namei.c:1731 [inline]
__ext4_unlink+0xa8/0x3e4 fs/ext4/namei.c:3215
ext4_unlink+0x150/0x200 fs/ext4/namei.c:3291
vfs_unlink+0x1dc/0x300 fs/namei.c:4252
do_unlinkat+0x200/0x3dc fs/namei.c:4320
__do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4363 [inline]
__se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4356 [inline]
__arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x7c/0xa8 fs/namei.c:4356
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x140 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:197
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ea_inode->i_lockkey);
lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
lock(&ea_inode->i_lockkey);
lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz-executor.0/3645:
#0: ffff0000cba7a460 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x64 fs/namespace.c:393
#1: ffff0000caafc760 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:792 [inline]
#1: ffff0000caafc760 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_unlinkat+0xf0/0x3dc fs/namei.c:4303
#2: ffff0000caafbdc0 (&ea_inode->i_lockkey){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:757 [inline]
#2: ffff0000caafbdc0 (&ea_inode->i_lockkey){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vfs_unlink+0x78/0x300 fs/namei.c:4241
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 3645 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc8-syzkaller-00172-ga5541c0811a0-dirty #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156
show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2055
check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x3084 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
down_read+0x5c/0x78 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1509
ext4_find_inline_entry+0x80/0x224 fs/ext4/inline.c:1690
__ext4_find_entry+0xe8/0xb4c fs/ext4/namei.c:1596
ext4_find_entry fs/ext4/namei.c:1731 [inline]
__ext4_unlink+0xa8/0x3e4 fs/ext4/namei.c:3215
ext4_unlink+0x150/0x200 fs/ext4/namei.c:3291
vfs_unlink+0x1dc/0x300 fs/namei.c:4252
do_unlinkat+0x200/0x3dc fs/namei.c:4320
__do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4363 [inline]
__se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4356 [inline]
__arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x7c/0xa8 fs/namei.c:4356
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x140 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:197
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
Tested on:
commit: a5541c08 Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12e927f8480000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=cbd4e584773e9397
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d3bb749184481f92deb5
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=14e927f8480000
next parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-29 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221229093654.2868-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-12-29 9:52 ` syzbot [this message]
[not found] <20221229005540.2777-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-12-29 1:23 ` [syzbot] [ext4?] possible deadlock in ext4_find_inline_entry syzbot
[not found] <20221228093841.2684-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-12-28 9:50 ` syzbot
2022-12-28 7:59 syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=000000000000d20e4a05f0f470e1@google.com \
--to=syzbot+d3bb749184481f92deb5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.