From: syzbot <syzbot+b44399433a41aaed7a9f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: chandan.babu@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [xfs?] possible deadlock in xfs_qm_dqfree_one
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 20:33:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000e981c10613fb227e@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 906a93befec8 Merge tag 'efi-fixes-for-v6.9-1' of git://git..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12d6ea6e180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=5206351398500a90
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b44399433a41aaed7a9f
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-906a93be.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f096ab7eaede/vmlinux-906a93be.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/52e0859d6157/bzImage-906a93be.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+b44399433a41aaed7a9f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.8.0-syzkaller-11405-g906a93befec8 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/109 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888022fc0958 (&qinf->qi_tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xfs_qm_dqfree_one+0x6f/0x1a0 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:1654
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8d930be0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x166/0x19a0 mm/vmscan.c:6782
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3698 [inline]
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3712
might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:312 [inline]
slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3746 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3827 [inline]
kmem_cache_alloc+0x4f/0x320 mm/slub.c:3852
radix_tree_node_alloc.constprop.0+0x7c/0x350 lib/radix-tree.c:276
radix_tree_extend+0x1a2/0x4d0 lib/radix-tree.c:425
__radix_tree_create lib/radix-tree.c:613 [inline]
radix_tree_insert+0x499/0x630 lib/radix-tree.c:712
xfs_qm_dqget_cache_insert.constprop.0+0x38/0x2c0 fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c:826
xfs_qm_dqget+0x182/0x4a0 fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c:901
xfs_qm_scall_setqlim+0x172/0x1980 fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c:300
xfs_fs_set_dqblk+0x166/0x1e0 fs/xfs/xfs_quotaops.c:267
quota_setquota+0x4c5/0x5f0 fs/quota/quota.c:310
do_quotactl+0xb03/0x13e0 fs/quota/quota.c:802
__do_sys_quotactl fs/quota/quota.c:961 [inline]
__se_sys_quotactl fs/quota/quota.c:917 [inline]
__x64_sys_quotactl+0x1b4/0x440 fs/quota/quota.c:917
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xd2/0x260 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
-> #0 (&qinf->qi_tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
xfs_qm_dqfree_one+0x6f/0x1a0 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:1654
xfs_qm_shrink_scan+0x25c/0x3f0 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:531
do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
shrink_slab+0x18a/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:662
shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4774
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4835 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4935 [inline]
shrink_node+0x231f/0x3a80 mm/vmscan.c:5894
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6704 [inline]
balance_pgdat+0x9a0/0x19a0 mm/vmscan.c:6895
kswapd+0x5ea/0xb90 mm/vmscan.c:7164
kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&qinf->qi_tree_lock);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&qinf->qi_tree_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by kswapd0/109:
#0: ffffffff8d930be0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x166/0x19a0 mm/vmscan.c:6782
stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 109 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-11405-g906a93befec8 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
xfs_qm_dqfree_one+0x6f/0x1a0 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:1654
xfs_qm_shrink_scan+0x25c/0x3f0 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:531
do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
shrink_slab+0x18a/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:662
shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4774
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4835 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4935 [inline]
shrink_node+0x231f/0x3a80 mm/vmscan.c:5894
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6704 [inline]
balance_pgdat+0x9a0/0x19a0 mm/vmscan.c:6895
kswapd+0x5ea/0xb90 mm/vmscan.c:7164
kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-19 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-19 3:33 syzbot [this message]
2024-03-19 3:45 ` [syzbot] Re: [syzbot] [xfs?] possible deadlock in xfs_qm_dqfree_one syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=000000000000e981c10613fb227e@google.com \
--to=syzbot+b44399433a41aaed7a9f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.