From: syzbot <syzbot+36bb70085ef6edc2ebb9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in attr_data_get_block
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:43:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000ea9fef05eb3621b6@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: bbed346d5a96 Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13ce2a7c880000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3a4a45d2d827c1e
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=36bb70085ef6edc2ebb9
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e8e91bc79312/disk-bbed346d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c1cb3fb3b77e/vmlinux-bbed346d.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+36bb70085ef6edc2ebb9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
ntfs3: loop4: Different NTFS' sector size (1024) and media sector size (512)
ntfs3: loop4: Mark volume as dirty due to NTFS errors
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.4/15497 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff000116476948 (&ni->file.run_lock#3){++++}-{3:3}, at: attr_data_get_block+0x84/0xa54 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:899
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000c7543ad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:87 [inline]
ffff0000c7543ad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0xa0/0x1d0 mm/util.c:550
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
__might_fault+0x7c/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5577
_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:134 [inline]
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:160 [inline]
fiemap_fill_next_extent+0xc4/0x1f8 fs/ioctl.c:144
ni_fiemap+0x4cc/0x620 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:2051
ntfs_fiemap+0x9c/0xdc fs/ntfs3/file.c:1245
ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:219 [inline]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x10f0/0x16a4 fs/ioctl.c:810
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:868 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x98/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
-> #0 (&ni->file.run_lock#3){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
down_read+0x5c/0x78 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1499
attr_data_get_block+0x84/0xa54 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:899
ntfs_file_mmap+0x1d0/0x2e4 fs/ntfs3/file.c:387
call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2192 [inline]
mmap_region+0x7fc/0xc14 mm/mmap.c:1752
do_mmap+0x644/0x97c mm/mmap.c:1540
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xe8/0x1d0 mm/util.c:552
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1cc/0x278 mm/mmap.c:1586
__do_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:28 [inline]
__se_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mmap+0x58/0x6c arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
lock(&ni->file.run_lock#3);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
lock(&ni->file.run_lock#3);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor.4/15497:
#0: ffff0000c7543ad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:87 [inline]
#0: ffff0000c7543ad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0xa0/0x1d0 mm/util.c:550
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 15497 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/30/2022
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156
show_stack+0x2c/0x54 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2053
check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
down_read+0x5c/0x78 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1499
attr_data_get_block+0x84/0xa54 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:899
ntfs_file_mmap+0x1d0/0x2e4 fs/ntfs3/file.c:387
call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2192 [inline]
mmap_region+0x7fc/0xc14 mm/mmap.c:1752
do_mmap+0x644/0x97c mm/mmap.c:1540
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xe8/0x1d0 mm/util.c:552
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1cc/0x278 mm/mmap.c:1586
__do_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:28 [inline]
__se_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mmap+0x58/0x6c arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-17 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 7:43 syzbot [this message]
2022-12-04 18:11 ` [syzbot] possible deadlock in attr_data_get_block syzbot
2024-06-19 6:52 ` [syzbot] fs/ntfs3: Do copy_to_user out of run_lock syzbot
2024-07-17 6:24 ` [syzbot] possible fix syzbot
2024-07-17 8:19 ` [syzbot] syzbot
[not found] <20221205100829.7319-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-12-05 16:39 ` [syzbot] possible deadlock in attr_data_get_block syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=000000000000ea9fef05eb3621b6@google.com \
--to=syzbot+36bb70085ef6edc2ebb9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ntfs3@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.