From: syzbot <syzbot+f60646ed0fee22ac695d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: possible deadlock in freeze_super
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 13:15:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000ebfc4605b4b892b2@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: a349e4c6 Merge tag 'xfs-5.10-fixes-7' of git://git.kernel...
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16158d71500000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=6867674f76eceeb6
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f60646ed0fee22ac695d
compiler: gcc (GCC) 10.1.0-syz 20200507
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+f60646ed0fee22ac695d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.10.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1H/2986 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801cdca0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#83){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: freeze_super+0x41/0x330 fs/super.c:1716
but task is already holding lock:
ffffc90001b2fda8 ((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x854/0x15a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2247
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 ((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
process_one_work+0x8a2/0x15a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2248
worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2418
kthread+0x3af/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:296
-> #1 ((wq_completion)glock_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}:
flush_workqueue+0x110/0x13e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2783
gfs2_gl_hash_clear+0xad/0x270 fs/gfs2/glock.c:1987
gfs2_put_super+0x44b/0x680 fs/gfs2/super.c:740
generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464
kill_block_super+0x97/0xf0 fs/super.c:1446
gfs2_kill_sb+0x104/0x160 fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:1662
deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335
deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366
cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118
task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:151
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:164 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x17e/0x1a0 kernel/entry/common.c:191
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x38/0x260 kernel/entry/common.c:266
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&type->s_umount_key#83){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2866 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2991 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3606 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ca6/0x5c00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4830
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5435 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x2a3/0x8c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5400
down_write+0x8d/0x150 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1531
freeze_super+0x41/0x330 fs/super.c:1716
freeze_go_sync+0x193/0x2c0 fs/gfs2/glops.c:587
do_xmote+0x2ff/0xbc0 fs/gfs2/glock.c:616
run_queue+0x323/0x680 fs/gfs2/glock.c:753
glock_work_func+0xff/0x3f0 fs/gfs2/glock.c:926
process_one_work+0x933/0x15a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2272
worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2418
kthread+0x3af/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:296
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&type->s_umount_key#83 --> (wq_completion)glock_workqueue --> (work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work));
lock((wq_completion)glock_workqueue);
lock((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work));
lock(&type->s_umount_key#83);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/0:1H/2986:
#0: ffff888016d03938 ((wq_completion)glock_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic64_set arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:34 [inline]
#0: ffff888016d03938 ((wq_completion)glock_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic64_set include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:856 [inline]
#0: ffff888016d03938 ((wq_completion)glock_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic_long_set include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:41 [inline]
#0: ffff888016d03938 ((wq_completion)glock_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_data kernel/workqueue.c:616 [inline]
#0: ffff888016d03938 ((wq_completion)glock_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_pool_and_clear_pending kernel/workqueue.c:643 [inline]
#0: ffff888016d03938 ((wq_completion)glock_workqueue){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x821/0x15a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2243
#1: ffffc90001b2fda8 ((work_completion)(&(&gl->gl_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x854/0x15a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2247
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 2986 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 5.10.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Workqueue: glock_workqueue glock_work_func
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x107/0x163 lib/dump_stack.c:118
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2115
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2866 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2991 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3606 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ca6/0x5c00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4830
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5435 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x2a3/0x8c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5400
down_write+0x8d/0x150 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1531
freeze_super+0x41/0x330 fs/super.c:1716
freeze_go_sync+0x193/0x2c0 fs/gfs2/glops.c:587
do_xmote+0x2ff/0xbc0 fs/gfs2/glock.c:616
run_queue+0x323/0x680 fs/gfs2/glock.c:753
glock_work_func+0xff/0x3f0 fs/gfs2/glock.c:926
process_one_work+0x933/0x15a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2272
worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2418
kthread+0x3af/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:296
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-22 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-22 21:15 syzbot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-10 21:52 possible deadlock in freeze_super Marius Fleischer
2024-06-12 11:48 ` Christian Brauner
2024-06-12 18:36 ` Marius Fleischer
2024-10-15 19:29 ` Marius Fleischer
2024-10-16 8:36 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-10-17 22:47 ` Marius Fleischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=000000000000ebfc4605b4b892b2@google.com \
--to=syzbot+f60646ed0fee22ac695d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.