From: syzbot <syzbot+9d95beb2a3c260622518@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
wojciech.gladysz@infogain.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] possible deadlock in trie_delete_elem
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 01:24:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000f9b3ac061a204910@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PN2PR01MB4891BF795360AE31E349CFECFCF92@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Hello,
syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in trie_delete_elem
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00022-g32f88d65f01b #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/6309 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88802e40e1f8 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802e40c1f8 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&trie->lock);
lock(&trie->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by syz-executor.1/6309:
#0: ffff88807ada5090 (&child->perf_event_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: perf_event_exit_task+0x9b/0xaa0 kernel/events/core.c:13184
#1: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2402 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x1fc/0x540 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2444
#2: ffff88802e40c1f8 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462
#3: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2402 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e333f60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0x1fc/0x540 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2444
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 6309 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00022-g32f88d65f01b #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3062 [inline]
validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3856
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462
bpf_prog_1db1603a7cfa36fb+0x45/0x49
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1243 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:691 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:698 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2403 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x2ec/0x540 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2444
__traceiter_contention_end+0x7b/0xb0 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
trace_contention_end+0x114/0x140 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0xb81/0xdc0 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:557
pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:584 [inline]
queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x42/0x50 arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:51
queued_spin_lock include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:114 [inline]
do_raw_spin_lock+0x272/0x370 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:116
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xe1/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462
bpf_prog_1db1603a7cfa36fb+0x45/0x49
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1243 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:691 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:698 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2403 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x2ec/0x540 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2444
__traceiter_contention_end+0x7b/0xb0 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
trace_contention_end+0xf5/0x120 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:617 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x2e5/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
perf_event_exit_task+0x9b/0xaa0 kernel/events/core.c:13184
do_exit+0xa37/0x27e0 kernel/exit.c:883
do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1023
__do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1034 [inline]
__se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1032 [inline]
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1032
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f7af347dca9
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f7af347dc7f.
RSP: 002b:00007ffc344b9708 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000001e RCX: 00007f7af347dca9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00007f7af3400000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000
</TASK>
Tested on:
commit: 32f88d65 Merge tag 'linux_kselftest-fixes-6.10-rc3' of..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=162ace06980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=eb72437243175f22
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9d95beb2a3c260622518
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Note: no patches were applied.
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-05 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891BF795360AE31E349CFECFCF92@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-05 8:24 ` syzbot [this message]
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891E7B8CF9B3C1531CB9ADEFCFB2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-07 7:45 ` [syzbot] [bpf?] possible deadlock in trie_delete_elem syzbot
[not found] <20240606141413.137516-1-norkam41@gmail.com>
2024-06-06 14:38 ` syzbot
[not found] <20240606140352.135948-1-norkam41@gmail.com>
2024-06-06 14:26 ` syzbot
[not found] <20240606135139.134172-1-norkam41@gmail.com>
2024-06-06 13:55 ` syzbot
[not found] <MAXPR01MB316750CFC54579A6A384FF91F7FA2@MAXPR01MB3167.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 13:40 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891DFF0F26C14B0A7ED225EFCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 13:39 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB489146FC0041ED737236BE64FCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 13:17 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891F53CC6107BBDB25C8C09FCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 13:10 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB489159F2619858474EF92FC5FCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 12:32 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB489190072C2A23C3C1CCCE2FFCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 12:12 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB48911035081582F4B9893F9FFCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 11:47 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891AE31D63427B828C79ECBFCFA2@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-06 9:27 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB4891734D357ACCDDD106F360FCF92@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-05 7:57 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB489119119088A1E7091BB6B9FCF92@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-05 7:39 ` syzbot
[not found] <PN2PR01MB489171CD7B0E226F8256C23DFCF92@PN2PR01MB4891.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2024-06-05 7:17 ` syzbot
2024-03-20 8:42 syzbot
2024-03-20 10:32 ` Hillf Danton
2024-03-20 19:42 ` syzbot
2024-03-20 14:20 ` syzbot
2025-05-08 7:13 ` syzbot
2025-05-08 18:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-08 23:39 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=000000000000f9b3ac061a204910@google.com \
--to=syzbot+9d95beb2a3c260622518@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=wojciech.gladysz@infogain.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.