All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+ada12d2d935bbc82aa7f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in do_unlinkat
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 10:13:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000fa007305fcd83579@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    933174ae28ba Merge tag 'spi-fix-v6.4-rc3' of git://git.ker..
git tree:       upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=167d464d280000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=7d8067683055e3f5
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ada12d2d935bbc82aa7f
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.7, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=106e6d19280000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=13cf84e5280000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/189d556c105e/disk-933174ae.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/498458304963/vmlinux-933174ae.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/68bcd9d7c04c/bzImage-933174ae.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a89e85025777/mount_0.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+ada12d2d935bbc82aa7f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

REISERFS (device loop0): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.4.0-rc3-syzkaller-00032-g933174ae28ba #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor392/4995 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888022309090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x7a/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880759902e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
ffff8880759902e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_unlinkat+0x26a/0x950 fs/namei.c:4378

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691
       down_write_nested+0x3d/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
       inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
       do_unlinkat+0x26a/0x950 fs/namei.c:4378
       __do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4436 [inline]
       __se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4429 [inline]
       __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xce/0xf0 fs/namei.c:4429
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #1 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691
       percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
       __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1494 [inline]
       sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1569
       mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x1f0 fs/namespace.c:438
       reiserfs_ioctl+0x174/0x340 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl+0xf1/0x160 fs/ioctl.c:856
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3108 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3227 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x166b/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3842
       __lock_acquire+0x1295/0x2000 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5074
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691
       __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
       __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
       mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
       reiserfs_write_lock+0x7a/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
       reiserfs_lookup+0x162/0x580 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364
       lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x11b/0x250 fs/namei.c:1605
       do_unlinkat+0x298/0x950 fs/namei.c:4379
       __do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4436 [inline]
       __se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4429 [inline]
       __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xce/0xf0 fs/namei.c:4429
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &sbi->lock --> sb_writers#9 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1);
                               lock(sb_writers#9);
                               lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1);
  lock(&sbi->lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor392/4995:
 #0: ffff88807d18c460 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:394
 #1: ffff8880759902e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
 #1: ffff8880759902e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_unlinkat+0x26a/0x950 fs/namei.c:4378

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 4995 Comm: syz-executor392 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc3-syzkaller-00032-g933174ae28ba #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/16/2023
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x2fe/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2188
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3108 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3227 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x166b/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3842
 __lock_acquire+0x1295/0x2000 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5074
 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691
 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
 reiserfs_write_lock+0x7a/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
 reiserfs_lookup+0x162/0x580 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364
 lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x11b/0x250 fs/namei.c:1605
 do_unlinkat+0x298/0x950 fs/namei.c:4379
 __do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4436 [inline]
 __se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4429 [inline]
 __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xce/0xf0 fs/namei.c:4429
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7ffa0fa838f9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 51 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48



---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

If you want to change bug's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the bug is a duplicate of another bug, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

             reply	other threads:[~2023-05-29 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-29 17:13 syzbot [this message]
2024-02-19 17:26 ` [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in do_unlinkat syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=000000000000fa007305fcd83579@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+ada12d2d935bbc82aa7f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.