From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267560AbTCFBiD>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:38:03 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267595AbTCFBiD>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:38:03 -0500
Received: from collamer.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([199.174.114.9]:48680 "EHLO
	collamer.mail.atl.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S267560AbTCFBiC>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:38:02 -0500
From: "Stephen Corey" <s_corey@netzero.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel tuning for high latency satellite link??
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:48:56 -0500
Message-ID: <000001c2e382$93d5c830$640111ac@corey>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

What problems have you seen with PILC? And you're recommending setting 
the send & receive maxes to (bandwidth (in bps) * delay (in 
milliseconds))?