From: "Anders Kullenberg" <akullen@swipnet.se>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] extreme fan rpms with atk0110
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:39:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001cbe287$e555d120$b0017360$@se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110312212759.3c9e0e56@endymion.delvare>
Hi Jean,
> Ämne: Re: [lm-sensors] extreme fan rpms with atk0110
>
> Anders,
>
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:39:42 +0100, Anders Kullenberg wrote:
> > Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> Please don't top-post.
Sorry for that, now I know how to do it.
>
> > I checked the BIOS readings. They are normal, even below 800rpm. I
> have the
> > asus q-fan enabled in the bios that should control fan speeds. I
> tried to
> > disable it, didn't change anything.
> > It is possible to select ACPI 1.0, 2.0 or 3.0 in the bios, any
> > recommendations on that?
>
> I'd go for ACPI 2.0 as the best compromise between recentness and
> support level, but in the end it really depends on what the BIOS adds
> in each case, and whether Linux properly supports that yet or not. But
> anyway it probably doesn't matter for the problem at hand.
I switched the setting to ACPI 2.0
>
> > The fans are not any special stuff as far as I'm aware. They are
> connected
> > to the motherboard directly, no potentiometers used in the
> installation.
>
> OK. Maybe you should send your board's DSDT to Luca for analysis then.
Done.
>
> > I found no chip "atk0110-*" section in /etc/sensors3.conf, what
> config is
> > used then, where should I put the compute statements?
>
> The ATK0110 usually doesn't need any configuration, as the driver knows
> all the scaling factors and labels. But you are free to add a new
> configuration section for it if you really have to.
>
> I'm a little surprised as the M2V isn't a recent board, so it should be
> already supported, or more users would have reported by now. Did you
> look for a BIOS update for your board?
Have the latest bios available from asus homepage.
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
Some more info. Don't know if it is of use but I have configured munin to
read the sensor output.
Over the last ~24hour both the fan RPM readings has decreased with ~4000 rpm
in a very stable decrease over time.
During the same period the temp readings have been very stable on the same
level.
Thanks
Anders
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-12 20:27 [lm-sensors] extreme fan rpms with atk0110 Jean Delvare
2011-03-12 21:39 ` Anders Kullenberg
2011-03-12 21:56 ` Jean Delvare
2011-03-12 22:54 ` Luca Tettamanti
2011-03-14 20:39 ` Anders Kullenberg [this message]
2011-03-15 14:01 ` Luca Tettamanti
2011-03-15 14:58 ` Jean Delvare
2011-03-15 16:01 ` Luca Tettamanti
2011-03-15 19:39 ` Anders Kullenberg
2011-03-16 11:38 ` Jean Delvare
2011-03-20 22:36 ` Anders Kullenberg
2011-03-24 8:40 ` Jean Delvare
2011-03-24 17:23 ` Anders Kullenberg
2011-03-24 18:08 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001cbe287$e555d120$b0017360$@se' \
--to=akullen@swipnet.se \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.