From: "Deane Coleman" <deanewcoleman@gmail.com>
To: <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <deanewcoleman@gmail.com>
Subject: help re using nvme-cli to sanitize SSD
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:08:17 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001da9459$f353b340$d9fb19c0$@com> (raw)
Hi Gang,
I'm pre-novice when it comes to command lines, let alone nvme-cli, and
respectfully seek your assistance to successfully achieve the objective now
described.
I have an Acer laptop containing 1 x internal Samsung NVMe PCIe SSD running
Win11 OS and I wish to completely sanitize the SSD of all user data,
including over-provisioned / non-allocated space, whilst leaving vendor boot
capability intact (if possible) and causing least wear on the SSD. Once
sanitized, I wish to clean install Win 11 OS on the SSD. This is the
objective.
Win11 reports the SSD has 3 unencrypted partitions, as follows: 1) Fat32 EFI
system partition / volume; 2) NTFS data partition / boot volume; and 3) NTFS
MS recovery partition.
My limited use of nvme-cli identifies the SSD has only one controller
'nvme0' (with nvme0 containing all SSD data) and one namespace 'nvme0n1',
however I presume (and please correct me if I'm wrong) the 3 above mentioned
partitions in Linux = nvme0n1p1 + nvme0n1p2 + nvme0n1p3.
Based on above info (and presuming that info is sufficient), I respectfully
ask whether the following procedure will 'smoothly' achieve the objective:
1: backup all user data currently on SSD
2: have bootable Win11 ISO file prepped on USB drive via Rufus
3: boot laptop using Ubuntu Live USB
4: Open command terminal and run command - 'nvme sanitize -a 2 /dev/nvme0n1'
to start block erase sanitize operation
5: when sanitize operation is complete, exchange Ubuntu Live USB for Win11
USB and reboot laptop
6: Follow Win11 install procedures
7: Install Acer drivers
8: Install target apps
Additional questions arising from above:
- If any above element won't achieve objective, please clarify what needs
amending?
- I currently understand 'nvme sanitize -a 4 /dev/nvme0n1' (crypto erase)
causes least SSD wear but because all user data on the SSD is currently
unencrypted, I presume crypto erase is pointless to achieve objective?
- I've tried researching the following sanitize options but am currently
unable to appreciate their significance or relevance for the objective: 'No
Deallocate After Sanitize' and 'Sanitize Action...001b - Exit Failure Mode'.
Would you please help me discern whether I need to include either of these
options to meet the objective and, if so, the correct syntax placement in
the sanitize command for it/ them.
As I'm so novice, please respond in most simplistic terms for my sake.
Thanks for considering my request and kind regards,
Deane Coleman
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-22 2:08 Deane Coleman [this message]
2024-04-22 2:49 ` help re using nvme-cli to sanitize SSD Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001da9459$f353b340$d9fb19c0$@com' \
--to=deanewcoleman@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.