From: <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
To: <Administrator@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <akpm@osdl.org>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PPC32: New OCP core support
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 04:00:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000101c437cd$52469fc0$d100000a@sbs2003.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 May 2004 17:01:50 PDT." <20040511170150.A4743@home.com>
On Tue, 11 May 2004 17:01:50 PDT, Matt Porter said:
> New OCP infrastructure ported from 2.4 along with several
> enhancements. Please apply.
Big honking patch. Wholesale removal of old code. Wholesale addition of
new code.
And this is the closest to a hint of what an OCP in the old code:
- * @device: OCP device such as PCI, GPT, UART, OPB, IIC, GPIO, EMAC, ZMII
- * @dev_num: ocp device number whos paddr you want
And in the new:
+extern struct ocp_def core_ocp[]; /* Static list of devices, provided by
+ CPU core */
And some vendor IDs that say that IBM and FreeScale make them, and Motorola
apparently rebadges/clones Freescale's (or vice versa)..
I'm *guessing* that this is some all-in-one integrated
north/south/PCI/east bridge with an APIC or similar and some I/O
controllers.... Or maybe it's a board-level designator like 'ebony'
seems to be.. or something..
It's a UART... or a Bus-level board.. or both.. ;)
arch/ppc/Kconfig says this:
config OCP
bool
depends on IBM_OCP
default y
that leads to arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/Kconfig:
config IBM_OCP
bool
depends on ASH || CPCI405 || EBONY || EP405 || OCOTEA || REDWOOD_5 || REDWOOD_6 || SYCAMOR
E || WALNUT
default y
Grepping for OCP in arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/* isn't informative either..
Color me mystified.. ;)
(Actually, other than the apparent lack of any comment that says what
an OCP in fact is, I didn't see any really big style problems while
scrolling through it..)
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-12 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-12 0:01 [PATCH 1/2] PPC32: New OCP core support Matt Porter
2004-05-12 0:39 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 1:01 ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12 1:10 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 3:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 13:32 ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12 3:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 1:45 ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12 2:00 ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12 0:57 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12 1:06 ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12 1:45 ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12 2:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-12 3:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-12 1:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12 3:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2004-05-12 3:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-12 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-12 13:39 ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12 6:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000101c437cd$52469fc0$d100000a@sbs2003.local' \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=Administrator@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.