From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Fedin Subject: RE: [GIT PULL 4/5] Late Samsung driver updates for v4.4 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:49:05 +0300 Message-ID: <000101d11155$1f8d6eb0$5ea84c10$@samsung.com> References: <562AA40E.4050407@kernel.org> <562AA603.7040600@kernel.org> <56307B33.90608@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:12530 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964913AbbJ1HtK (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 03:49:10 -0400 Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0NWX000NS71V5740@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 07:49:07 +0000 (GMT) In-reply-to: <56307B33.90608@samsung.com> Content-language: ru Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' , 'Kukjin Kim' , arm@kernel.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' , 'Olof Johansson' , 'Kevin Hilman' Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Hello! > The question is - do you prefer us to send a following up patch or to > fix it by amending the commit? > > Here is a fix which can be squashed into these two commits: By the way, since we are discussing fixing these commits... After hardcoded SROMc handling has been removed, Exynos5410-based machines stopped handling it entirely, because the description has never been added to exynos5410.dtsi (which does not include exynos5.dtsi). Shouldn't the description be added there too? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: p.fedin@samsung.com (Pavel Fedin) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:49:05 +0300 Subject: [GIT PULL 4/5] Late Samsung driver updates for v4.4 In-Reply-To: <56307B33.90608@samsung.com> References: <562AA40E.4050407@kernel.org> <562AA603.7040600@kernel.org> <56307B33.90608@samsung.com> Message-ID: <000101d11155$1f8d6eb0$5ea84c10$@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello! > The question is - do you prefer us to send a following up patch or to > fix it by amending the commit? > > Here is a fix which can be squashed into these two commits: By the way, since we are discussing fixing these commits... After hardcoded SROMc handling has been removed, Exynos5410-based machines stopped handling it entirely, because the description has never been added to exynos5410.dtsi (which does not include exynos5.dtsi). Shouldn't the description be added there too? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia