From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Dlkwz-0001jR-EG for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 02:58:17 -0700 Received: from fra-del-03.spheriq.net ([195.46.51.99]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.41) id 1Dlkwv-0000gC-E2 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 02:58:17 -0700 Received: from fra-out-01.spheriq.net (fra-out-01.spheriq.net [195.46.51.129]) by fra-del-03.spheriq.net with ESMTP id j5O9w3me031032 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:58:03 GMT Received: from fra-cus-01.spheriq.net (fra-cus-01.spheriq.net [195.46.51.37]) by fra-out-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id j5O9v4us021805 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:57:04 GMT From: Alex LIU Subject: RE: [uml-devel] Question about the unexpected signal 11 when fork in UML-2.6.7 TT mode Message-ID: <000301c578a3$2cc33480$9eb3c68a@SHZ.ST.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" In-Reply-To: <200506211741.34136.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:57:45 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: 'Blaisorblade' , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net I just let the SIGSEVG go and return from the sleeping_process_signal function instead of tracer_panic and hanging the UML. It seems ok. Is it dangerous? Thanks a lot! Alex -----Original Message----- From: Blaisorblade [mailto:blaisorblade@yahoo.it] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 11:42 PM To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Alex LIU Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Question about the unexpected signal 11 when fork in UML-2.6.7 TT mode On Tuesday 21 June 2005 12:05, Alex LIU wrote: > Hi,all: > > When I fork() in UML TT mode,it always said "the sleeping process xxx > received unexpedted signal 11" and the UML hang...before fork I also > set the signal handler... My UML is 2.6.7 and I used TT mode.Thanks a > lot! > Alex Have you a good reason to use UML 2.6.7? We can't know by heart the list of all fixed bugs in previous UML releases, really, and you'll be doing yourself a favor by upgrading to 2.6.11-bs5 or 2.6.12 (which contains almost everything from -bs). That said, you are talking about userspace code, right? It's anyway strange that your system boots but you can't write a simple code that fork()'s. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op�k _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel