All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mitani" <mitani@ryobi.co.jp>
To: "'Serge E. Hallyn'" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	Rishikesh K Rajak <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] cap_bounds_r.c build failure
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:20:59 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000301cad20b$2269c230$673d4690$@co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100401152647.GH22648@us.ibm.com>

Hi,


I tired to upgrade "libcap" from "libcap-1.0-20" to "libcap-2.11".
My system is RHEL4.8 (x86) and kernel version is 2.6.9-89.ELsmp.

I downloaded "libcap-2.11.tar.gz" from following URL :
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/libcap2

I extended it, and I confirmed that there are ".../libcap/include/
linux/capability.h" and ".../libcap/include/sys/capability.h" .
".../libcap/include/linux/capability.h" has "CAP_LAST_CAP" definition.

I did "make" and "make install".
But "/usr/include/linux/capability.h" was not changed.

the "README" of "libcap-2.11" shows follows:
------------
# INSTALLATION

        Linux-Caps % make

                builds the library and the programs

        Linux-Caps % make install

                installs the library libcap.XX.Y in /lib/
                the binaries in /sbin/
                the <sys/capability.h> file in /usr/include
------------
It doesn't mention about "/usr/include/linux/capability.h" .
In fact, "/usr/include/sys/capability.h" was replaced, but 
"/usr/include/linux/capability.h" was not.


I checked where <linux/capability.h> came from, and knew that 
"/usr/include/linux/capability.h" is from "glibc-kernheaders" :
------------
[root@RHEL4-8 cap_bound]# rpm -qf /usr/include/linux/capability.h
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.103.EL
[root@RHEL4-8 cap_bound]#
------------


There are two ways to upgrade "/usr/include/linux/capability.h" in
RHEL system, I think.
1) Upgrade "glibc-kernheaders".
2) Replace manually "/usr/include/sys/capability.h" with 
   "linux/capability.h" of "libcap-2.11".

1) "glibc-kernheaders" is referenced from many modules of kernel.
   If I want to upgrade "glibc-kernheaders", kernel upgrade is needed, 
   I think.
   It deviates from an original purpose (I want to test RHEL4.8 system).
2) Manually replace is not an original way and it is dangerous.


First of all, I replaced manually "/usr/include/linux/capability.h" .
And I succeeded to build "cap_bounds_r.c" and "cap_bounds_r.c".


But upgrading "libcap" in RHEL system still includes the above 
problems, I think


------
After this, another build failed.
But it is different from above problems, I think.
Therfore, I will report it another thread.


Regards--

-Tomonori Mitani

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge E. Hallyn [mailto:serue@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 12:27 AM
> To: Mitani
> Cc: 'Rishikesh K Rajak'; ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [LTP] cap_bounds_r.c build failure
> 
> Quoting Mitani (mitani@ryobi.co.jp):
> > Hi Rishi,
> >
> > I installed "libcap-devel", but after configure, build failed, too.
> >
> > ------------
> > [root@RHEL4-8 mitani]# rpm -qa | grep libcap
> > libcap-devel-1.10-20
> > libcap-1.10-20
> > [root@RHEL4-8 mitani]#
> > ------------
> >
> > "libcap-1.10-20" version is normal version in my system (RHEL4.8
> > 2.6.9-89.ELsmp).
> > In this version, capability.h doesn't have CAP_LAST_CAP definition.
> > I try to upgrade version "2.11".
> 
> Yeah, you need libcap2 for these tests.  I guess we could stand
> to add a rule to m4/ltp-cap.m4 to check for the existance of
> libcap.so.2.X, X > oh say 12.
> 
> -serge



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-02  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-01  8:13 [LTP] cap_bounds_r.c build failure Mitani
2010-04-01  8:35 ` Rishikesh K Rajak
2010-04-01  9:23   ` Mitani
2010-04-01  9:35     ` Rishikesh K Rajak
2010-04-01 11:24       ` Mitani
2010-04-01 15:26         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-04-02  2:20           ` Mitani [this message]
2010-04-05 13:20             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-04-09  7:49               ` Mitani
2010-04-16 18:39                 ` Garrett Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000301cad20b$2269c230$673d4690$@co.jp' \
    --to=mitani@ryobi.co.jp \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.