From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y3JO1-0007wG-FU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 01:56:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y3JNv-0001Hn-CM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 01:56:05 -0500 Received: from mail.ispras.ru ([83.149.199.45]:56925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y3JNv-0001HC-5V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 01:55:59 -0500 From: "Pavel Dovgaluk" References: <1418661511-22348-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1418661511-22348-27-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20141219021916.GB9468@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> In-Reply-To: <20141219021916.GB9468@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:55:54 +0300 Message-ID: <000301d01e7d$806592b0$8130b810$@Dovgaluk@ispras.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: ru Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 26/47] cpu-exec: reset exception_index correctly List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: 'Eduardo Habkost' , 'Paolo Bonzini' Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > From: Eduardo Habkost [mailto:ehabkost@redhat.com] > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:38:10PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > From: Pavel Dovgalyuk > > > > Exception index is reset at every entry at every entry into cpu_exec() > > function. This may cause missing the exceptions while replaying them. > > This patch moves exception_index reset to the locations where they are > > processed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > > x86_64-linux-user is broken after applying this patch: > > [qemu/(e511b4d...)|BISECTING]$ ./install/bin/qemu-x86_64 /bin/true > qemu: uncaught target signal 8 (Floating point exception) - core dumped > Floating point exception (core dumped) I cannot reproduce this bug. QEMU runs and terminates correctly. Can you show me call stack for the exception? Pavel Dovgalyuk