From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marius Petrescu" Subject: RE: AX25 Node problem - please help Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 23:58:34 +0300 Message-ID: <000401cf51da$f98929b0$ec9b7d10$@ro> References: <53412F05.4090306@mybunker.plus.com> <53419279.3090804@mybunker.plus.com> <5341ADD0.2050303@trinnet.net> Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-us Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org If this is Brian's whish we can not argue. BTW: Brian Rogers = N1URO = author of UroNode, in case the link is not clear. 73s, Marius, YO2LOJ -----Original Message----- From: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Longland VK4MSL Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 23:36 To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: AX25 Node problem - please help On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 12:41:04 -0700, David Ranch wrote: > yet UroNode is *not* included in most distribution packages per the > request of the developer. Okay, what's the logic in that? If UroNode fixes a lot of the problems in the original "node" package, why package it up in the distributions where it will get wider visibility and coverage? I'll admit I hadn't even heard of it until Brian Rogers mentioned it in an earlier thread, with a link to it on an obscure FTP site. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html