From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Postmaster" Subject: Re: question about -t nat Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:25:22 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <000601c45654$b22cf970$6900a8c0@W2K> References: <000701c45626$e27411a0$6900a8c0@W2K> <1087670301.2051.0.camel@localhost> <000b01c45637$42d805a0$6900a8c0@W2K> <1087683517.2052.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > Hmmm . . . I'll have to defer to others who know more about modules. I > always compile mine as part of the kernel just in case. I see the > iptable_nat so I'm not sure what's missing. Is there any chance the > userland tools are mismatched to the kernel? > -- unfortunately not. otherwise i could change something. both machines are clean and selfmade from scratch. the differential of the second mashine is the kernelversion 2.4.22 with CONFIG_KMOD --> y. but on the real firewall i wont do anything automaticly. on a third mashine kernel 2.4.26, iptables 1.2.9 and all of modules are build in kernel, a rule with DNAT in a userchain also wont work. i believe nearly in an error on the second mashine :( Jan