[PATCH] ARM: change definition of cpu_relax() for ARM11MPCore

[will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)]

Hi Santosh,

> > This patch changes the definition of cpu_relax() to smp_mb() for ARMv6 cores,
> > forcing a flushing of the write buffer on SMP systems before the next load
> > takes place. If the Kernel is not compiled for SMP support, this will expand
> > to a barrier() as before.
> >
> I have missed this thread. Is this not applicable for ARMv7 MP Cores as well??

You can pick up on some of the old thread here:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-April/012874.html

Actually, the ChangeLog I wrote for that patch is better, so I'll update
my current one.

To answer your question; this problem only occurs on ARM11MPCore. For ARMv7MP,
stores are guaranteed to become visible eventually [i.e. they can't be held up
indefinitely by a sequence of aggresive loads].

An addition to the ARM ARM [Section A3.8.2] says:

* For an implementation that does not include the Multiprocessing Extensions,
it is IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED whether all writes become globally observed in
their shareability domain in a finite period of time, or whether in some cases,
software must execute a DSB to ensure the visibility of some writes.

* For an implementation that includes the Multiprocessing Extensions, all writes
become globally observed in their shareability domain in a finite period of time. 

Will