From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:04:03 +0900
Subject: [GIT PULL] samsung: fixes for v3.1-rc1
In-Reply-To: <201108121758.01077.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
References: <20110811065837.GA4989@july>
	<015001cc57f5$d7e847f0$87b8d7d0$%kim@samsung.com>
	<201108121758.01077.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <000601cc596e$0ba61490$22f23db0$%kim@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> On Thursday 11 August 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > >   Linux 3.1-rc1 (2011-08-07 18:23:30 -0700)
> > >
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > >   git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung for-arnd
> > >
> 
> > No, if above is required, I think, this should be handled from me not
you.
> >
> > Don't make a complete confusion between your board and Samsung
architecture
> > maintainer.
> 
> I'll hold off on pulling this one then until I get another pull request
> from you.
> 
> Looking at the contents of the branch, I noticed that it's not clear why
> they are needed in 3.1. It would help me if you (whoever sends me the bug
> fixes) can categorize them in the changelog:
> 
> * Any bug fixes against old bugs should be marked 'Cc: stable at kernel.org'
> so that they can get identified for backports.
> 
> * Regressions against the 3.0 kernel should get marked as such.
> 
> * Bug fixes against new code should also be identified as such.
> 
OK, I see.

As a note, I will send Samsung fixes in the beginning of next week.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.