[PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: Use list_for_each_entry_reverse instead of list_for_each_entry

[Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>]

Most of the cpufreq table is sorted in descending order.
But when cpufreq table is made from dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table,
it is sorted in ascending order. So in some case to make cpufreq table
with descending order it needs an extra work.

Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/base/power/opp.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
index 2553867..8d81a46 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	list_for_each_entry(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
+	list_for_each_entry_reverse(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
 		if (opp->available) {
 			freq_table[i].driver_data = i;
 			freq_table[i].frequency = opp->rate / 1000;
-- 
1.7.10.4