From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: "'Vincent Guittot'" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"'Dietmar Eggemann'" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"'Juri Lelli'" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"'Steven Rostedt'" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"'Mel Gorman'" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"'open list:THERMAL'" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Linus Torvalds'" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"'Sargun Dhillon'" <sargun@sargun.me>,
"'Tejun Heo'" <tj@kernel.org>,
"'Xie XiuQi'" <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>, <xiezhipeng1@huawei.com>,
"'Srinivas Pandruvada'" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] sched/freq: move call to cpufreq_update_util
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 07:07:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000601d59c8f$9fa191c0$dee4b540$@net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtDyZ5gom41S-8Nu+BMK7hPijWoZPqo0HFYkRnNmWo1UTA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
I tested both Vincent's V4 and Peter's, I called it V1.
8000 seconds intel_pstate_tracer on a very idle system.
Everything was fine.
Vincent-V4:
Maximum time between calls to the intel_pstate driver,
per CPU: 4.00813 seconds: GOOD/PASS
Total entries/exits to/from driver: 90,730:
Consistent with previous tests / expectations.
228,600 aperf clocks / second / cpu.
Consistent with previous tests / expectations.
Peter-V1:
Maximum time between calls to the intel_pstate driver,
per CPU: 4.00407 seconds: GOOD/PASS
Total entries/exits to/from driver: 96,440:
Consistent with previous tests / expectations.
241,310 aperf clocks / second / cpu.
Consistent with previous tests / expectations.
Baseline reference:
Maximum time between calls to the intel_pstate driver,
per CPU: 225.03 seconds: BAD/FAIL
Number of durations over an arbitrary threshold of
10 seconds: 379.
Total entries/exits to/from driver: 75,969:
Consistent with previous tests / expectations,
when the issue is present.
226,963 aperf clocks / second / cpu.
Consistent with previous tests / expectations.
I did not do the load no-load energy test.
It is not possible for it to be a problem
if the long duration issue is solved.
I'll do the test, if someone wants the proof.
Kernels were 5.4-rc7 + linux next.
Idle governor was TEO, but this isn't actually relevant.
Tested-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
... Doug
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-16 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-14 17:07 [PATCH v4] sched/freq: move call to cpufreq_update_util Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 10:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-15 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 11:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 10:18 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 10:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 11:59 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 12:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 10:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 11:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 13:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 15:30 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-15 10:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-15 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 11:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-15 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 13:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 14:12 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 15:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 18:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-15 20:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 21:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-16 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-11-16 15:07 ` Doug Smythies [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000601d59c8f$9fa191c0$dee4b540$@net' \
--to=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=xiezhipeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.