RE: [PATCH] libxl: tooling expects wrong errno

[Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@gmail.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
> Sent: 26 June 2020 12:25
> To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
> Cc: paul@xen.org; Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>; 'Grzegorz Uriasz' <gorbak25@gmail.com>; 'Jan
> Beulich' <jbeulich@suse.com>; Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>; Kevin Tian
> <kevin.tian@intel.com>; 'Wei Liu' <wl@xen.org>; jakub@bartmin.ski; marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com;
> j.nowak26@student.uw.edu.pl; Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>; xen-
> devel@lists.xenproject.org; contact@puzio.waw.pl
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: tooling expects wrong errno
> 
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:39:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Paul Durrant writes ("RE: [PATCH] libxl: tooling expects wrong errno"):
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
> > > > Thanks for the analysis.  So:
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
> > > >
> > > > This would seem to be a backport candidate.  AFAICT check has been
> > > > there, looking for ENOSYS, since this code was introduced in
> > > >    826eb17271d3c647516d9944c47b0779afedea25
> > > >    libxl: suppress device assignment to HVM guest when there is no IOMMU
> > > > ?
> > > >
> > > > But that commit has a Tested-by.  Maybe Xen changed its error return
> > > > at some point ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, it happened in 71e617a6b8f69849c70eda1b3c58f1ff6b244e5a
> > > use is_iommu_enabled() where appropriate...
> >
> > So,
> >
> > Backport: 4.13
> >
> > Thanks!
> 
> This is not yet committed. Paul, can I get a release ack from you?
> 
> Wei.

Yes.

Release-acked-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>

> 
> >
> > Ian.