diff for duplicates of <000701d95257$e97ebd50$bc7c37f0$@samsung.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 05ddf4f..070f230 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -37,37 +37,29 @@
 > >                         iommus = <&sysmmu_mfc>;
 > >                 };
 > > There is no iommu-names property for compatible "samsung,exynos3250-
-> mfc, samsung,mfc-v7", that’s why I kept
-> >         iommus:
-> >           minItems: 1
-> >           maxItems: 2
-> > I would even go with below if you agree?
-> >         iommus:
-> >           minItems: 1
-> >           maxItems: 2
-> >         iommus-names: false
-> 
-> No, I don't agree. Why do you need two IOMMUs for Exynos3250?
-> >
-Here IOMMUs minItems:1 is meant for Exynos3250 while IOMMUs maxItems:2 meant for samsung,mfc-v5(Exynos 4).
-As you suggested 
-iommus:
-  maxItems: 1
-iommu-names: false
-
-won't fit here.
-Since IOMMUs maxItems is 2 here for Exynos4. Giving maxItems:2 alone will also break the bindings. Thanks why suggested
-         iommus:
-           minItems: 1
-           maxItems: 2
-> 
-> Best regards,
+> mfc, samsung,mfc-v7", that’s why I kept\r
+> >         iommus:\r
+> >           minItems: 1\r
+> >           maxItems: 2\r
+> > I would even go with below if you agree?\r
+> >         iommus:\r
+> >           minItems: 1\r
+> >           maxItems: 2\r
+> >         iommus-names: false\r
+> \r
+> No, I don't agree. Why do you need two IOMMUs for Exynos3250?\r
+> >\r
+Here IOMMUs minItems:1 is meant for Exynos3250 while IOMMUs maxItems:2 meant for samsung,mfc-v5(Exynos 4).\r
+As you suggested \r
+iommus:\r
+  maxItems: 1\r
+iommu-names: false\r
+\r
+won't fit here.\r
+Since IOMMUs maxItems is 2 here for Exynos4. Giving maxItems:2 alone will also break the bindings. Thanks why suggested\r
+         iommus:\r
+           minItems: 1\r
+           maxItems: 2\r
+> \r
+> Best regards,\r
 > Krzysztof
-
-
-
-
-_______________________________________________
-linux-arm-kernel mailing list
-linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index ee560a7..2618cd9 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -70,39 +70,31 @@
  "> >                         iommus = <&sysmmu_mfc>;\n"
  "> >                 };\n"
  "> > There is no iommu-names property for compatible \"samsung,exynos3250-\n"
- "> mfc, samsung,mfc-v7\", that\342\200\231s why I kept\n"
- "> >         iommus:\n"
- "> >           minItems: 1\n"
- "> >           maxItems: 2\n"
- "> > I would even go with below if you agree?\n"
- "> >         iommus:\n"
- "> >           minItems: 1\n"
- "> >           maxItems: 2\n"
- "> >         iommus-names: false\n"
- "> \n"
- "> No, I don't agree. Why do you need two IOMMUs for Exynos3250?\n"
- "> >\n"
- "Here IOMMUs minItems:1 is meant for Exynos3250 while IOMMUs maxItems:2 meant for samsung,mfc-v5(Exynos 4).\n"
- "As you suggested \n"
- "iommus:\n"
- "  maxItems: 1\n"
- "iommu-names: false\n"
- "\n"
- "won't fit here.\n"
- "Since IOMMUs maxItems is 2 here for Exynos4. Giving maxItems:2 alone will also break the bindings. Thanks why suggested\n"
- "         iommus:\n"
- "           minItems: 1\n"
- "           maxItems: 2\n"
- "> \n"
- "> Best regards,\n"
- "> Krzysztof\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
+ "> mfc, samsung,mfc-v7\", that\342\200\231s why I kept\r\n"
+ "> >         iommus:\r\n"
+ "> >           minItems: 1\r\n"
+ "> >           maxItems: 2\r\n"
+ "> > I would even go with below if you agree?\r\n"
+ "> >         iommus:\r\n"
+ "> >           minItems: 1\r\n"
+ "> >           maxItems: 2\r\n"
+ "> >         iommus-names: false\r\n"
+ "> \r\n"
+ "> No, I don't agree. Why do you need two IOMMUs for Exynos3250?\r\n"
+ "> >\r\n"
+ "Here IOMMUs minItems:1 is meant for Exynos3250 while IOMMUs maxItems:2 meant for samsung,mfc-v5(Exynos 4).\r\n"
+ "As you suggested \r\n"
+ "iommus:\r\n"
+ "  maxItems: 1\r\n"
+ "iommu-names: false\r\n"
+ "\r\n"
+ "won't fit here.\r\n"
+ "Since IOMMUs maxItems is 2 here for Exynos4. Giving maxItems:2 alone will also break the bindings. Thanks why suggested\r\n"
+ "         iommus:\r\n"
+ "           minItems: 1\r\n"
+ "           maxItems: 2\r\n"
+ "> \r\n"
+ "> Best regards,\r\n"
+ > Krzysztof
 
-b97c959e1cc39b856c530c0e196278b06528999b290489c12c121b8a0946f4b7
+3a5b3a9f12d0ec1af0baa6141486f6a23b736e22d98831bbbca5b26cd44fe646
