From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <000801c17ecf$39db7be0$8d19fea9@tin.it> From: "Peter Thalmann" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C17ED7.9B3B2EA0" Subject: [linux-lvm] LVM/RAID or viceversa? Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Dec 6 21:26:01 2001 List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C17ED7.9B3B2EA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hallo,=20 I catched you on the ml, discussing on lvm and raid,so please explain me = the difference between raid on top of lvm and lvm on top of raid. Is it = first setting up the disk using raid tools and then configuring the lvm = (lvm on top of raid) or first setting up the drives using lvm and then = setting up the raid (raid on top of lvm) wich makes actually no sense to = me because of confusing the layers and making managemnet quite = difficult. Am I wrong ? Thanks, Peter "a nice little guy from italy" ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C17ED7.9B3B2EA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hallo,
I catched you on the ml, discussing on = lvm and=20 raid,so please explain me the = difference between=20 raid on top of lvm and lvm on top of raid. Is it first setting up the = disk using=20 raid tools and then configuring the lvm (lvm on top of raid) or first = setting up=20 the drives using lvm and then setting up the raid (raid on top of lvm) = wich=20 makes actually no sense to me because of confusing the layers and making = managemnet quite difficult. Am I wrong ?
 
Thanks, Peter
 
"a nice little guy from=20 italy"
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C17ED7.9B3B2EA0--