From: "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [KJ] RE: [PATCH 14/21] net/s2io: replace schedule_timeout() with
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:37:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000801c50ed6$7b101950$4510100a@pc.s2io.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200501172315.j0HNFAaH027053@guinness.s2io.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6847 bytes --]
Nishanth,
We did some basic testing after applying your patch and it seems okay.
Pls submit the patch to maintainer. But I've couple of comments on
your patch.
The below code change is incorrect. It should be msleep(500).
> @@ -3808,8 +3797,7 @@ static int s2io_rldram_test(nic_t * sp,
> val64 = readq(&bar0->mc_rldram_test_ctrl);
> if (val64 & MC_RLDRAM_TEST_DONE)
> break;
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 2);
> + msleep(200);
In the function s2io_ethtool_idnic(), call to schedule_timeout() has not
been replaced with msleep(). I've given below the code change I did before
testing.
@@ -3284,11 +3277,10 @@
sp->id_timer.data = (unsigned long) sp;
}
mod_timer(&sp->id_timer, jiffies);
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
if (data)
- schedule_timeout(data * HZ);
+ msleep(data*1000);
else
- schedule_timeout(MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ msleep(0xFFFFFFFF);
del_timer_sync(&sp->id_timer);
if (CARDS_WITH_FAULTY_LINK_INDICATORS(subid)) {
Thanks,
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Raghavendra Koushik [mailto:raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 3:15 PM
To: 'Nishanth Aravamudan'
Cc: kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org; 'Ravinandan Arakali'
Subject: RE: [PATCH 14/21] net/s2io: replace schedule_timeout() with
msleep()
Correct me if Iam wrong, but isn't HZ always defined as
"number of jiffies" on the machine that equals 1sec in duration.
So even if duration of jiffy varies, Macro HZ is assured to be 1 sec.
This way schedule_timeout (HZ / 2) on any machine is supposed to
timeout after half a second and so on and so forth.
-Koushik
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nishanth Aravamudan [mailto:nacc@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 3:06 PM
> To: raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com
> Cc: kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
> Subject: [PATCH 14/21] net/s2io: replace schedule_timeout()
> with msleep()
>
> Hi,
>
> Please consider applying.
>
> Description: Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to
> guarantee the task
> delays as expected. This makes the code independent of HZ
> values (particularly
> important when HZ changes or is dynamic).
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
>
>
> --- 2.6.11-rc1-kj-v/drivers/net/s2io.c 2005-01-15
> 16:55:41.000000000 -0800
> +++ 2.6.11-rc1-kj/drivers/net/s2io.c 2005-01-16
> 23:50:59.000000000 -0800
> @@ -684,8 +684,7 @@ static int init_nic(struct s2io_nic *nic
> val64 = 0;
> writeq(val64, &bar0->sw_reset);
> val64 = readq(&bar0->sw_reset);
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 2);
> + msleep(500);
>
> /* Enable Receiving broadcasts */
> add = (void *) &bar0->mac_cfg;
> @@ -938,8 +937,7 @@ static int init_nic(struct s2io_nic *nic
> dev->name);
> return -1;
> }
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 20);
> + msleep(50);
> time++;
> }
>
> @@ -977,8 +975,7 @@ static int init_nic(struct s2io_nic *nic
> return -1;
> }
> time++;
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 20);
> + msleep(50);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1407,8 +1404,7 @@ static int start_nic(struct s2io_nic *ni
> SPECIAL_REG_WRITE(val64, &bar0->mc_rldram_mrs, UF);
> val64 = readq(&bar0->mc_rldram_mrs);
>
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 10); /* Delay by around 100 ms. */
> + msleep(100); /* Delay by around 100 ms. */
>
> /* Enabling ECC Protection. */
> val64 = readq(&bar0->adapter_control);
> @@ -2423,8 +2419,7 @@ int wait_for_cmd_complete(nic_t * sp)
> ret = SUCCESS;
> break;
> }
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 20);
> + msleep(50);
> if (cnt++ > 10)
> break;
> }
> @@ -2463,15 +2458,13 @@ void s2io_reset(nic_t * sp)
> * As of now I'am just giving a 250ms delay and hoping that the
> * PCI write to sw_reset register is done by this time.
> */
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 4);
> + msleep(250);
>
> /* Restore the PCI state saved during initializarion. */
> pci_restore_state(sp->pdev);
> s2io_init_pci(sp);
>
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 4);
> + msleep(250);
>
> /* SXE-002: Configure link and activity LED to turn it off */
> subid = sp->pdev->subsystem_device;
> @@ -3391,8 +3384,7 @@ static int read_eeprom(nic_t * sp, int o
> ret = 0;
> break;
> }
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 20);
> + msleep(50);
> exit_cnt++;
> }
>
> @@ -3432,8 +3424,7 @@ static int write_eeprom(nic_t * sp, int
> ret = 0;
> break;
> }
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 20);
> + msleep(50);
> exit_cnt++;
> }
>
> @@ -3689,8 +3680,7 @@ static int s2io_bist_test(nic_t * sp, ui
> ret = 0;
> break;
> }
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 10);
> + msleep(100);
> cnt++;
> }
>
> @@ -3791,8 +3781,7 @@ static int s2io_rldram_test(nic_t * sp,
> val64 = readq(&bar0->mc_rldram_test_ctrl);
> if (val64 & MC_RLDRAM_TEST_DONE)
> break;
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 5);
> + msleep(200);
> }
>
> if (cnt == 5)
> @@ -3808,8 +3797,7 @@ static int s2io_rldram_test(nic_t * sp,
> val64 = readq(&bar0->mc_rldram_test_ctrl);
> if (val64 & MC_RLDRAM_TEST_DONE)
> break;
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 2);
> + msleep(200);
> }
>
> if (cnt == 5)
> @@ -4169,8 +4157,7 @@ static void s2io_set_link(unsigned long
> * Allow a small delay for the NICs self initiated
> * cleanup to complete.
> */
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 10);
> + msleep(100);
>
> val64 = readq(&bar0->adapter_status);
> if (verify_xena_quiescence(val64, nic->device_enabled_once)) {
> @@ -4224,10 +4211,8 @@ static void s2io_card_down(nic_t * sp)
> register u64 val64 = 0;
>
> /* If s2io_set_link task is executing, wait till it
> completes. */
> - while (test_and_set_bit(0, &(sp->link_state))) {
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 20);
> - }
> + while (test_and_set_bit(0, &(sp->link_state)))
> + msleep(50);
> atomic_set(&sp->card_state, CARD_DOWN);
>
> /* disable Tx and Rx traffic on the NIC */
> @@ -4243,8 +4228,7 @@ static void s2io_card_down(nic_t * sp)
> break;
> }
>
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 20);
> + msleep(50);
> cnt++;
> if (cnt == 10) {
> DBG_PRINT(ERR_DBG,
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-09 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-17 23:15 [KJ] RE: [PATCH 14/21] net/s2io: replace schedule_timeout() with Raghavendra Koushik
2005-01-17 23:29 ` [KJ] " Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-02-09 18:37 ` Ravinandan Arakali [this message]
2005-02-16 13:25 ` [KJ] " Domen Puncer
2005-02-16 14:31 ` Domen Puncer
2005-02-16 23:54 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-02-17 0:13 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-02-17 0:24 ` Ravinandan Arakali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000801c50ed6$7b101950$4510100a@pc.s2io.com' \
--to=ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.