All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexander V. Bilichenko" <dmor@7ka.mipt.ru>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 8139too bug in 2.4.4 (2.4.3?) & VIA 686a
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 16:33:49 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000901c0d628$cd521b40$d55355c2@microsoft> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010506130303.20add56a.ignaciomonge@navegalia.com> <20010506135139.5fccf928.ignaciomonge@navegalia.com>

I have the same bug in latest driver. And disabling MMIO didn't help...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ignacio Monge" <ignaciomonge@navegalia.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: 8139too bug in 2.4.4 (2.4.3?) & VIA 686a


> En Sun, 6 May 2001 13:03:03 -0400
> Ignacio Monge <ignaciomonge@navegalia.com> escribió:
>
> >
> > I've compiled 2.4.3mdk-25 source with Athlon optimizations, and the
> > problem still happens.
> >
> > eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
> >           inet addr:192.168.0.1  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> >           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:4294967221 overruns:0 frame:0
> >           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> >           RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
> >           Interrupt:11 Base address:0x9000
> >
> > Look at the HWaddr. With default kernel (not compiled), I haven't this
> > problem and my ethernet card goes well and the HWaddr is: ·"HWaddr
> > 00:E0:29:9A:CB:62 ". And I'm sure after reboot I *MUST* restore all the
> > values of my BIOS setup. Believe me,  I know. :(
> >
> >
> > Here is the output of dmesg when loading the 81389too module:
> >
> > Assertion failed! ioaddr != NULL,8139too.c,rtl8139_init_one,line=927
> > eth0: SMC1211TX EZCard 10/100 (RealTek RTL8139) at 0x9000,
> > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, IRQ 11
> > eth0:  Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139C'
> > eth0: Setting 100mbps half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner
> > ability
> > ffff.
> >
> > "Assertion failed! ioaddr != NULL,8139too.c,rtl8139_init_one,line=927"?
> > What is this? Is this the cause of the bug?
> >
> > Now the lspci -vv:
> >
> > 00:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Accton Technology Corporation SMC2-1211TX
> > (rev 10)
> > Subsystem: Accton Technology Corporation EN-1207D Fast Ethernet Adapter
> > Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
> > Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> > Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
> > <TAbort-
> > <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> > Latency: 32 (8000ns min, 16000ns max)
> > Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> > Region 0: I/O ports at 9000 [size=256]
> > Region 1: Memory at da800000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
> > Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=64K]
> > Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
> > Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA
> > PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
> > Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> >
> > I hope these lines can help.
>
>
> ADDON:
>
> Dmesg:
> [...
> NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> eth0: Tx queue start entry 4  dirty entry 0.
> eth0:  Tx descriptor 0 is ffffffff. (queue head)
> eth0:  Tx descriptor 1 is ffffffff.
> eth0:  Tx descriptor 2 is ffffffff.
> eth0:  Tx descriptor 3 is ffffffff.
> eth0: Setting 100mbps half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner ability
> ffff.
> probable hardware bug: clock timer configuration lost - probably a VIA686a
> motherboard.
> probable hardware bug: restoring chip configuration.
>
> ...]
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-06 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-06 17:03 8139too bug in 2.4.4 (2.4.3?) & VIA 686a Ignacio Monge
2001-05-06 17:51 ` Ignacio Monge
2001-05-06 12:33   ` Alexander V. Bilichenko [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-06 21:11 Ignacio Monge
2001-05-06  6:49 Ignacio Monge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000901c0d628$cd521b40$d55355c2@microsoft' \
    --to=dmor@7ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.