From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thhoep" Subject: Re: Performance Monitoring Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 09:54:04 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <000901c3d757$4d37e060$1684188d@Kiste> References: <004401c3d17c$4baa7cc0$0a01000a@xcom1> <3FF9E4B7.8010109@lintelsys.com.au> <011001c3d3f8$6a6a7e20$7700000a@lawrencewin2k> <3FFA33C7.9010806@lintelsys.com.au> <20040106033802.30955.qmail@paus.pesat.net.id> <20040105230233.27d84a49.michael@bluesuperman.com> <20040110000419.GA25191@cannon.eng.us.uu.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Ramin Dousti , Michael Gale Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > One can come up with a btree which should reduce the worst case lookup to a max > of 8 lookups for a /24. i did this once with a traffic counting system. works nice, still not perfect, but nice.