From: "Stuart Lamble" <stu@gateway10.homeip.net>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Prerouting question
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 20:28:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000a01c41c04$f22f4e90$0464a8c0@stu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404061916.39265.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Hi
OK, I understand it now - "FORWARD and INPUT are filter tables" - bells
start ringing!
Thanks Antony, you make good sense.
Cheers
Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org] On Behalf Of Antony Stone
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 8:17 PM
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Prerouting question
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 7:00 pm, Stuart Lamble wrote:
> Hi All
>
> If prerouting is the first rule a packet touches when arriving at the
> firewall, why then do we not set the default to DROP here and allow
> through what we need.
<Pedantic response>
Because PREROUTING is a nat table, and nat tables are for Network
Address
Translation. FORWARD and INPUT are filter tables (the default if you
don't
specify in iptables rules), and that's where filtering operations such
as
DROP, REJECT, ACCEPT should be done.
</Pedant>
<Pragmatic response>
Because all sorts of things will go wrong if you try this. </Pragmatist>
<Conntrack response>
Because all traffic passing through the interface has to go through the
PREROUTING table, and this is where lots of connection tracking magic
happens
in the background, meaning that you (read: the rules in the PREROUTING
table)
don't see many of the packets going past, yet they still obey the
default
chain policy. Therefore you can't catch all the packets you need to
allow
(they get handled behind the scenes), and you don't want to DROP any of
the
ones you can't see.
</Conntrack>
Regards,
Antony.
--
I'm pink, therefore I'm Spam.
Please reply to the
list;
please don't
CC me.
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.650 / Virus Database: 416 - Release Date: 4/4/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.650 / Virus Database: 416 - Release Date: 4/4/2004
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-06 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-06 18:00 Prerouting question Stuart Lamble
2004-04-06 18:16 ` Antony Stone
2004-04-06 18:23 ` Cedric Blancher
2004-04-06 18:28 ` Stuart Lamble [this message]
2004-04-06 18:21 ` Cedric Blancher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000a01c41c04$f22f4e90$0464a8c0@stu' \
--to=stu@gateway10.homeip.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.