From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Joel Pearson" Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:14:07 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] wonder shaper and 'unmetered ip addresses/ranges' Message-Id: <000b01c4591b$990e8070$1b00a8c0@ROADLAP> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01C4596F.6ABA9070" List-Id: To: lartc@vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C4596F.6ABA9070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey, =20 I was fiddling with wonder shaper and it works great, except in my = situation I only have 1 real network interface and the other interface is a = virtual interface ie eth0:0, and tc doesn't seem to support that. I have 2 = subnets, one of which goes to the router which then goes to the internet, and the other subnet which contains the rest of the computers which go through = this server and then onto the internet giving me the oppertunity to shape = traffic and have a transparent proxy etc. I know its not secure, ie they can = avoid the proxy all together, but in my office no-one has a clue how it all = works, so I'm fine. =20 So my question is, am I able to have certain ip destinations that are = exempt from traffic situation, because on this server I run samba shares too, = and shaping samba down to 25 k/s makes it very painful. I've noticed a lot = of ISP's in Australia have certain ip addresses are exempt from shaping and download limits, so I know it is possible. But tc doesn't make a whole = heap of sense to me, but it looks like it *should* be able to do what I want = to do. I want to make 192.168.40.0/255.255.255.0 exempt from shaping. Any = ideas anyone? =20 Thanks =20 -Joel =20 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Joel Pearson Email: pearj@writeme.com ICQ:1580379 =20 MSN: joelpearson@hotmail.com ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C4596F.6ABA9070 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Hey,
 
I was = fiddling with=20 wonder shaper and it works great, except in my situation I only have 1 = real=20 network interface and the other interface is a virtual interface ie = eth0:0, and=20 tc doesn't seem to support that. I have 2 subnets, one of which = goes to the=20 router which then goes to the internet, and the other subnet which = contains the=20 rest of the computers which go through this server and then onto the = internet=20 giving me the oppertunity to shape traffic and have a transparent proxy=20 etc.  I know its not secure, ie they can avoid the proxy all = together,=20 but in my office no-one has a clue how it all works, so I'm=20 fine.
 
So my = question is,=20 am I able to have certain ip destinations that are exempt from traffic=20 situation, because on this server I run samba shares too, and shaping = samba down=20 to 25 k/s makes it very painful.  I've noticed a lot of ISP's in = Australia=20 have certain ip addresses are exempt from shaping and download limits, = so I know=20 it is possible.  But tc doesn't make a whole heap of sense to me, = but it=20 looks like it *should* be able to do what I want to = do.
I want = to make=20 192.168.40.0/255.255.255.0 exempt from shaping.  Any ideas=20 anyone?
 
Thanks
 
-Joel
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Joel=20 Pearson
Email: pearj@writeme.com
ICQ:1580379
= MSN: joelpearson@hotmail.com
------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C4596F.6ABA9070-- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/