From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzswing.ncsc.mil (jazzswing.ncsc.mil [144.51.68.65]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA14679 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 23:48:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jazzswing.ncsc.mil (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jazzswing.ncsc.mil with ESMTP id DAA00611 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 03:47:53 GMT Received: from mail.simplyaquatics.com (66-0-92-223.deltacom.net [66.0.92.223]) by jazzswing.ncsc.mil with ESMTP id DAA00607 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 03:47:53 GMT Received: from ed (ed1 [192.168.1.10]) by mail.simplyaquatics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32750844054 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 23:48:41 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: From: "Ed Street" To: Subject: RE: A 'Statement of Assurance' on SELinux patents Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 23:48:40 -0400 Message-ID: <000e01c23cfc$279e5bf0$0a01a8c0@ed> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <200208060136.g761a7K21461@gismo8.allwell.inhouse> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Hello, So basically SCC is telling us they don't care what we do with Selinux as long as they do not have a product that would be considered 'competitive' I do believe that this is discussed under the Sherman act and in the constitution :) So tell me what is prohibiting SCC from taking OUR additional work on Selinux and making a competitive product and using this 'agreement' to state that we/I can no longer use it. I have discussed this topic with some lawyer friends of mine and they said it stinks, full of holes and does violate several laws in the United States. In the end I do have the impression that SCC is in a financial crunch and looking for $ anywhere they can grab it. Now to pull SCC's financial reports. Ed -- You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.