All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fred -- Speed Up --" <speedup@free.fr>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: When is a defragmenting tool expected to be released?
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:14:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000e01c30bbb$23ca3470$0200a8c0@xpstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200304261414.00860._nasturtium@bigpond.com

In the article you pointed out I could read this :



3. What is the fragmentation policy of ReiserFS and how is it dealing with
it?

Hans Reiser: This is an area we are still experimenting with. We currently
do what ext2 does, and preallocate blocks. What XFS does is much better,
they allocate blocknrs to blocks at the time they are flushed to disk, and
this allows a much more efficient and optimal allocation to occur. We knew
we couldn't do it the XFS way and make code freeze for 2.4, but reiser4 is
being built around delayed allocation, and I'd like to thank the XFS
developers for taking the time to personally explain to me why delayed
allocation is the way to go.



Hans said Reiser4 would use data preallocate blocks as ext2 does, and the
Reiser4 feature paper is speaking about a "repacker" that should be fully
functionnal at 4.1 release. How do you feel about that ?

Fred

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "_nasturtium" <_nasturtium@bigpond.com>
To: "Anders Widman" <andewid@tnonline.net>; <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 6:14 AM
Subject: Re: When is a defragmenting tool expected to be released?


> On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 05:35 am, Anders Widman wrote:
> >    I  am  curious  about  if/when  a  defragmenting  tool that support
> >    reiserfs  will  be  available.  Please  do  not  say  to  tar/untar
> >    everything. I simply do not have enough storage for that.
>
> No defragmenting tools that I know of, or mentioned on the list.
>
> You might like to check out what Hans Reiser wrote at
> http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=69.
> Basically, reiser4 will have delayed allocation, like XFS, rather than the
> current ext2-like system of preallocating blocks, so it'll be a lot more
> fragmentation-resistant.
>
> However, if you just want to check fragmentation there's a program called
> mongo, it's a benchmarking package and you can see if your filesystem (or
> even individual files) are fragmented.
>
> Regards,
> _nasturtium
>


  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-26  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-25 19:35 When is a defragmenting tool expected to be released? Anders Widman
2003-04-26  4:14 ` _nasturtium
2003-04-26  6:14   ` Fred -- Speed Up -- [this message]
2003-04-26  7:30     ` Oleg Drokin
2003-04-26  7:56       ` Fred -- Speed Up --
2003-04-26  9:57         ` Oleg Drokin
2003-04-28  9:46         ` Hans Reiser
2003-04-26  9:52   ` Anders Widman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000e01c30bbb$23ca3470$0200a8c0@xpstation' \
    --to=speedup@free.fr \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.