From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BEPIv-0000ah-5f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:06:33 -0400
Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BEPFK-00086b-2r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:03:21 -0400
Received: from [81.228.10.109] (helo=av7-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BEPFJ-000869-HP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:02:49 -0400
Message-ID: <000e01c42391$a43fef20$0401a8c0@putte2k>
From: "Mike Nordell" <tamlin@algonet.se>
References: <000901c42388$509ff080$0401a8c0@putte2k>
	<200404161037.34899.jm@poure.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Windows 2000 installed without a problem
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:03:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Jean-Michel POURE wrote:

> Le vendredi 16 Avril 2004 09:56, Mike Nordell a =E9crit :
> > by means of setting nb_nics=3D0 before the "nb_nics1 =3D nb_nics;" at
> > the end of pc_init() in pc.c,
>
> It is the same as "qemu -nics 0"?

Right you are. Too much debugging seemingly can make one take the more
drastic measures to disable some things. In my defense I can say that
disabling AUD_init and SB16_init (which was required to be done by modify=
ing
source) was just 15 lines away.

I agree with the suggestion of a command line argument to disable SB16
completely, even that I disagree with giving it two consecutive leading
dashes. One is IMHO more than enough. :-)

/Mike