From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nishit Shah" Subject: Do nfnl_query and nfnl_catch are blocking fuctions ? Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:35:41 +0530 Message-ID: <000e01c88502$8f4212c0$adc63840$@com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: Return-path: Received: from mailhost.elitecore.com ([203.88.135.194]:51726 "EHLO elitecore.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752667AbYCMMEz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:04:55 -0400 Received: from nishitshah.elitecore.co.in (HELO elitecore3) ([192.168.1.76]) (envelope-sender ) by elitecore.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Mar 2008 11:41:20 -0000 Content-Language: en-us Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Is it possible that on hi= gh rate of conntrack addition/deletion/updation, nfnl_query or nfnl_catch, If space is not available at the sending socket these fuctions will block as they are u= sing sendto and recvmsg calls ? Rgds, Nishit Shah.=20 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html