All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ide-cs using 100% CPU
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:32:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000f01c47d7e$669727f0$6401a8c0@northbrook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: fa.ggacpdl.26on0d@ifi.uio.no

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hamie" <hamish@travellingkiwi.com>


> Robert Hancock wrote:
>
> >It isn't that the CPU is doing so much work, it's mostly waiting. However
> >
> >
>
> That was my point... While waiting, shouldn't the CPU be off doing
> something else? Like giving X some attention...
>
> >with this type of PIO access, the CPU must do all the reads/writes from
the
> >buffer and while doing this the CPU is blocked and cannot do anything
else.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Or is the CF requirements such that it's spending it's time doing the
> actual reads & writes from the buffer, and it's the hardware inserting
> wait-states when it's being accessed?
>

That's basically what's happening, when the CPU does a write or a read of
some data from the buffer, it has to wait for that to go all the way across
the bus and to/from the card, meanwhile no other useful work can be done
while it is waiting. As Alan Cox mentioned, having a hyperthreaded CPU helps
tremendously in such cases, since the other "half" of the CPU can be doing
useful work while the first half is blocked.


       reply	other threads:[~2004-08-08 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.hhjr2f2.1ql2t80@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.ggacpdl.26on0d@ifi.uio.no>
2004-08-08 19:32   ` Robert Hancock [this message]
     [not found] <fa.j0leddb.okcbor@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.goasld9.1q1kb05@ifi.uio.no>
2004-08-07 19:21   ` ide-cs using 100% CPU Robert Hancock
2004-08-08 15:24     ` Hamie
2004-07-18  9:30 Hamie
2004-08-06 19:27 ` Russell King
2004-08-06 19:33   ` Hamie
2004-08-06 19:38     ` Russell King
2004-08-07 17:55       ` Hamie
2004-08-07 22:26     ` Alan Cox
2004-08-08  9:03       ` Hamie
2004-08-08 15:24         ` Alan Cox
2004-08-09  9:57         ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-09 12:32           ` P
2004-08-09 20:11       ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000f01c47d7e$669727f0$6401a8c0@northbrook' \
    --to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.