From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH] KGDB: add smp_mb() in synchronisation during exception handler exit
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:17:09 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001101cac03a$d84d4820$88e7d860$@deacon@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B96B771.9050903@wildturkeyranch.net>
Hi George,
> > diff --git a/kernel/kgdb.c b/kernel/kgdb.c
> > index 761fdd2..ee7694b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kgdb.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kgdb.c
> > @@ -1537,6 +1537,7 @@ acquirelock:
> > * Wait till all the CPUs have quit
> > * from the debugger.
> > */
> > + smp_mb();
> > for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> > while (atomic_read(&cpu_in_kgdb[i]))
> > cpu_relax();
> >
> Doesn't this have the same issue if this cpu gets to the while prior to
> the other cpu doing its write. I would think the "smp_mb()" should be
> in the while loop not prior to it.
I don't think so. The deadlock in question is caused because the aggressive
reading in the polling loop prevents the write-buffer from being able to drain.
For a dual-core system the setup can be simplified like this:
Initially: x = 1, y = 1;
CPU1 CPU0
==== ====
while (y == 1); y = 0;
x = 0; while (x == 1); /* This loop prevents y from
leaving the store buffer */
So the patch inserts a memory barrier on CPU0 between the two lines,
forcing the update to y to become visible before the reads to x occur.
CPU1 will then trundle along happily and update x. The absence of a further
polling loop means that the update to x will become visible to CPU0 at some
future time.
Cheers,
Will
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-10 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-09 18:20 [PATCH] KGDB: add smp_mb() in synchronisation during exception handler exit Will Deacon
2010-03-09 18:20 ` Will Deacon
2010-03-09 21:02 ` [Kgdb-bugreport] " George Anzinger
2010-03-09 21:02 ` George Anzinger
2010-03-10 10:17 ` Will Deacon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001101cac03a$d84d4820$88e7d860$@deacon@arm.com' \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.