From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mike" Subject: Re: different DMZs which is better? Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:15:34 -0500 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <001201c2bb38$25e45980$1e01a8c0@win2k.com> References: <001e01c2bb10$05d79300$9865fea9@win2k.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org I talked with my ISP and they will route me a /30 for my firewall and a /28 for the DMZ segment. The DMZ will be hosting a webfarm does anyone have a list of things I should to the box besides filtering rules? like how I can stop directed broadcasts etc... I am going to accept Established and New connections in the forward chain going to the webservers and drop invalid. Is that ok for webservers or should I also accept related? Im only going to open up port 80 to the webservers and drop everything else. Thanks, Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike" To: Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:28 AM Subject: different DMZs which is better? > Hey guys Im deciding how I want to implement a DMZ for my company can anyone > tell me the pros and cons of my DMZs below? should I got with a routable > hosts in my DMZ and just filter out any port I don't want open or just port > forward over certain ports and use IP alias? > > Thanks, > Mike > > P.S excuse the art below I know it sucks. > > > cisco > | > | > | > eth0 > DMZ inet IPs(eth1)---Netfilter----private LAN (eth2) > > > > cisco > | > | > | > eth0 > DMZ private IPs(eth1)---Netfilter----private LAN (eth2) > > > >