All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin Clauss" <clauss@neuro.informatik.uni-ulm.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Problems with SCSI devices renaming...
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:47:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001201c4b5ea$958f0790$30493c86@clever> (raw)

Hi all,

i got a problem with my raid. Current setup:

        raiddev /dev/md/0
                raid-level              5
                nr-raid-disks           10
                nr-spare-disks          0
                persistent-superblock   1
                parity-algorithm        left-symmetric

                device /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
                raid-disk               0
                device /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target1/lun0/part1
                raid-disk               1
                device /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target2/lun0/part1
                raid-disk               2
                device /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target3/lun0/part1
                raid-disk               3
                device /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target4/lun0/part1
                raid-disk               4
                device /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target8/lun0/part1
                raid-disk               5
                device /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target9/lun0/part1
                raid-disk               6
                device /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target10/lun0/part1
                raid-disk               7
                device /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target11/lun0/part1
                raid-disk               8
                device /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target12/lun0/part1
                raid-disk               9

This works very fine so far. But when I attach an additional device to this
DEC Storage Device, I get an additional target on this SCSI bus. Now this
doesn't matter for the devfs names, but the superblock of the RAID saves
major/minor numbers that are wrong now. So the raid won't start anymore....
Shouldn't autodetect handle exactly this problem? (Yes, partition type is
linux raid autodetect for all raid disks...)

I guess, this should be a quite common problem, so I hope to find some
answers here.

Greetz,
Martin Clauss


             reply	other threads:[~2004-10-19 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-19 14:47 Martin Clauss [this message]
2004-10-19 15:02 ` Problems with SCSI devices renaming Luca Berra
2004-10-19 17:35   ` Martin Clauss
2004-10-19 19:38     ` Anu Matthew
2004-10-19 15:08 ` Matt Domsch
2004-10-19 15:15 ` Guy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001201c4b5ea$958f0790$30493c86@clever' \
    --to=clauss@neuro.informatik.uni-ulm.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.