From: "Wilfried BARNAVON" <wbarnavon@on-fire.net>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
Cc: Netfilter Mailinglist <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
technique@on-fire.net
Subject: Re: Daily svn snapshots now working again (was Re: patch-o-matic-ng stopped ?)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:49:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001201c6f86e$b39671b0$fa00a8c0@dolphin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20061024113551.GN6045@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org
Hello Harald,
Thank you to have answered me so quickly. I gonna test that.
Good health to you too !
Wilfried
Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> said:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:17:12PM +0200, Wilfried BARNAVON wrote:
> I was used to test new linux kernels with
> experimental patches for netfilter, and - oh surprise !- the last month
> patch-o-matic-ng archives are more and more little, and finally with a
> null content !
You can find the current patch-o-matic-ng repository at
http://svn.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/patch-o-matic-ng/
> What happens ? Is this the end of a centralized and structured
> iptables developpement ? Is there a break in the developpement team ?
patch-o-matic[-ng] alwayas was a collection of various contributions
from people around the net, not a form of centralized and structured
development
> Is there a secret replacement of netfilter that justifies this
> carelessness ?
nobody is careless. you just seem to be the first person to report that
problem to me.
> Just a bug in the patch-o-matic-ng "tar-gz" generator ?
Exactly. It's fixed now, please use the
ftp://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic-ng/snapshot/patch-o-matic-ng-20061024.tar.bz2
snapshot that I just created.
Cheers,
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harald Welte" <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: "Wilfried BARNAVON" <wbarnavon@on-fire.net>
Cc: <technique@on-fire.net>; "Netfilter Development Mailinglist"
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>; "Netfilter Mailinglist"
<netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1:35 PM
Subject: Daily svn snapshots now working again (was Re: patch-o-matic-ng
stopped ?)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-25 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1265.85.68.10.218.1161688632.squirrel@www.on-fire.net>
2006-10-24 11:35 ` Daily svn snapshots now working again (was Re: patch-o-matic-ng stopped ?) Harald Welte
2006-10-25 19:49 ` Wilfried BARNAVON [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001201c6f86e$b39671b0$fa00a8c0@dolphin' \
--to=wbarnavon@on-fire.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=technique@on-fire.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.