From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_Br=FCckmann?= Subject: Re: latency timer Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:48:13 +0100 Message-ID: <001501c1bf63$23656680$0300a8c0@wgilmenau> References: <200202262319.SAA08267@renoir.op.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Paul Davis , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > i would also mention that you may have potential problems doing this > with word-clock synced interfaces. its likely that they will generate > interrupts sufficiently close in time that you could be severely > stressing the full compliance of the PCI interrupt detect/CPU notify > system. basically, each card is going to reach the interrupt point at > almost exactly the same time, and this could cause problems even > though it theoretically should not (the APIC should buffer the 2nd > interrupt while the first is processed). > > i would be very suprised if even RME have tried this experiment: I > don't think ASIO has any way to link two physical devices together in > the way that ALSA permits. i may be wrong about that. So do you mean there is another way of synchronizing the cards? _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel